Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14892
| From | Michael Kesper <michael@familie-kesper.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm |
| Date | 2023-02-05 15:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FVNIK-3DbJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FVKBb-3BgI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Julian, Am 05.02.23 um 11:38 schrieb Julian Gilbey: > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in > bookworm? Because it would amount to about double the work for all those involved. Besides, Python 3.11 has some points for it: - Real performance gains for real workloads - It will be supported one year longer (so EOL is expected to be around the time bookworm will be out of stable, too). > I was trying to run some experiments in a virtual environment a few > days ago, and it turns out that several of the Python packages I > needed do not yet run on Python 3.11. I was saved by being able to > run in a Python 3.10 venv and download all the required packages from > PyPI. If bookworm shipped without python3.10, I would not have been > able to do my work. Removing python3.10 from bookworm will seriously > affect many of our users in a similar situation to me. ... > P.S. We should also fix #1036268 if we do keep python3.10 in bookworm; > I'm happy to do an NMU if needed. Maybe you could sponsor a "backport" of Python3.11? My 2 cents Michael
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm Michael Kesper <michael@familie-kesper.de> - 2023-02-05 15:00 +0100 Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2023-02-05 22:10 +0100
csiph-web