Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14819
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages |
| Date | 2023-01-14 20:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FNUxH-pT1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FNScx-ozq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FNSvT-oGO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FNUem-pMs-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On January 14, 2023 7:12:33 PM UTC, Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> wrote: >Hi Scott (2023.01.14_17:22:42_+0000) >> Take the example in #1027947. If this proposal had been in place >> already, what would he have been the generated dependency and how >> would it have worked? > >dh_python3 would have been able to generate >python3-tomli | python3-min-version (>= 3.11) > >instead of >python3-tomli | python3 (>> 3.11) > >Then, once python3.10 was dropped from supported, python3 would >Provides: python3-min-version (= 3.11), python3-max-version (= 3.11) > >The >= vs >> isn't particularly relevant here. At the moment python3 (>> 3.11) >effectively means >= 3.11, because it's always 3.11.something-something. And python3-min-version is a virtual package, so dpgk doesn't need any special knowledge to do the right thing, right? I think that's reasonable. Typically though doesn't the python interpreter package provide modules that are now incorporated? If python3.11 provides python3-tomli, won't that mess this up? Scott K
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-01-14 18:10 +0100
Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2023-01-14 18:30 +0100
Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-01-14 20:20 +0100
Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2023-01-14 20:40 +0100
Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2023-01-14 21:00 +0100
Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-01-14 21:00 +0100
Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2023-01-14 21:50 +0100
csiph-web