Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14819

Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min\|max) virtual packages
Date	Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:40:01 +0100
Message-ID	<FNUxH-pT1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<FNScx-ozq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FNSvT-oGO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FNUem-pMs-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jan 14 19:35:48 2023
Old-Return-Path	<debian@kitterman.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20698
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/43805CAE-004D-457D-A98A-DF637D7118D8@kitterman.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	32
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sat, 14 Jan 2023 19:34:59 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<43805CAE-004D-457D-A98A-DF637D7118D8@kitterman.com>
X-Original-References	<20230114170817.bcyfhgpvrupjdvjd@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> <70685CFF-B8F9-420D-B0BF-87644B7C3232@kitterman.com> <20230114191233.w5o3eu3ecdiyails@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14819

Show key headers only | View raw


On January 14, 2023 7:12:33 PM UTC, Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> wrote:
>Hi Scott (2023.01.14_17:22:42_+0000)
>> Take the example in #1027947.  If this proposal had been in place
>> already, what would he have been the generated dependency and how
>> would it have worked?
>
>dh_python3 would have been able to generate
>python3-tomli | python3-min-version (>= 3.11)
>
>instead of
>python3-tomli | python3 (>> 3.11)
>
>Then, once python3.10 was dropped from supported, python3 would
>Provides: python3-min-version (= 3.11), python3-max-version (= 3.11)
>
>The >= vs >> isn't particularly relevant here. At the moment python3 (>> 3.11)
>effectively means >= 3.11, because it's always 3.11.something-something.

And python3-min-version is a virtual package, so dpgk doesn't need any special knowledge to do the right thing, right?  I think that's reasonable.

Typically though doesn't the python interpreter package provide modules that are now incorporated?  If python3.11 provides python3-tomli, won't that mess this up?

Scott K

Thread

Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-01-14 18:10 +0100
  Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2023-01-14 18:30 +0100
    Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-01-14 20:20 +0100
      Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2023-01-14 20:40 +0100
        Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2023-01-14 21:00 +0100
        Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-01-14 21:00 +0100
        Re: Policy Proposal python3-supported-(min|max) virtual packages Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2023-01-14 21:50 +0100

csiph-web