Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #12807
| From | Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality |
| Date | 2022-04-20 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EeeYy-9Yhb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Ea1Gx-7o8W-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EaHPr-7PoU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:22:24AM -0400, micah anderson wrote: >On 2022-04-08 20:35:27, Julian Andres Klode wrote: >> it just occurred to me that despite the climate crisis about to >> destroy us all we don't really have anything in place to monitor >> and reduce our carbon emissions. > >Agreed. > >> I believe we need to commit ourselves to reducing this, but I fear > >Also, agreed. +1 from me! >I think Debian should commit to become carbon neutral, and then become >climate positive, and make that clear to others so that it may encourage >other projects to do the same. > >I think the path to doing this starts with the commitment from the >project. If we can get that commitment, then we are a long ways towards >making this happen. Other early steps should include establishing a sub-project/group to coordinate discussion and actions around the issue. >Then it is about determining the organization's carbon footprint. There >are organizations that can assist in determining this (eg. Offsetra). I think this is a big part of the work required: but, the other side of it is the software we provide that is used by others. An improvement on that side of things would have a great deal more impact than on our own infrastructure. >Finally, deciding on a way to reconcile that footprint. This may be the >contentious aspect, as not everyone will agree that the different >mechanisms that exist are the right ways to do this, but perhaps we can >delay this discussion until it is clear that Debian is committed to >making this happen. Makes sense to me. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland ✎ jmtd@debian.org 🔗 https://jmtd.net
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> - 2022-04-08 20:40 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-04-08 21:00 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> - 2022-04-08 21:20 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 23:00 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2022-04-13 19:30 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-04-29 09:50 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-04-29 11:30 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality micah anderson <micah@riseup.net> - 2022-04-10 17:40 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2022-04-20 11:40 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2022-09-21 08:10 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2022-09-21 09:40 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2022-09-21 14:30 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2022-04-13 11:40 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2022-04-13 14:40 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-04-13 17:10 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2022-04-13 17:40 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2022-04-13 18:50 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2022-04-13 17:50 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2022-04-13 17:50 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2022-04-20 21:00 +0200
Bits&Bäume Conference about digital sustainability (Berlin, October; CfP deadline 7 June) Laura Arjona Reina <larjona@debian.org> - 2022-05-13 08:50 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org> - 2022-04-13 20:00 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-04-21 06:10 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2022-04-21 06:50 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> - 2022-04-30 10:10 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-05-13 18:00 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-05-13 19:30 +0200
Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> - 2022-05-15 11:00 +0200
csiph-web