Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #242579
| From | daggs <daggs@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: stability level of testing |
| Date | 2021-12-01 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DpERP-6Uh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DpsdY-7Yz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DpsQG-8qr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Greetings Christian, > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2021 at 10:00 AM > From: "Christian Britz" <cbritz@t-online.de> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: stability level of testing > > daggs wrote: > > I'm thinking of migrating my main server to Debian, I need stability and recent version of small number of pkgs. > > in addition I need to recompile with a out of tree patch. > > I had Debian stable before but replaced it because upgrade broke the system and the versions used for the mentioned above set of pkgs were too old for what I need. > > I know that Testing has more recent pkgs version but I don't know how stable is it. > > Don't do it for a server facing the Internet. Testing does not have > timely security support by concept. > > Also by concept, it is of course not stable in the sense of Debian > stable distribution, it is more like a rolling release distribution. > > On my desktop, I currently use the testing distribution, but I install > Internet facing applications like browser and mail directly from the > vendor, not from Debian's repository. For example, Firefox and Chromium > often get security patches very late in Debian testing. > > there will be 2 main facing the Internet connection, server's upgrade and the router vm. the rest is internal Dagg.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-01 08:30 +0100
Re: stability level of testing Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> - 2021-12-01 09:10 +0100
Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-01 22:00 +0100
Re: stability level of testing Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> - 2021-12-01 23:00 +0100
Re: stability level of testing Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-12-02 00:40 +0100
Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 09:30 +0100
Re: stability level of testing Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-12-02 15:50 +0100
Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 18:50 +0100
Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 09:30 +0100
Re: stability level of testing "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-12-02 21:10 +0100
Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 22:30 +0100
Re: stability level of testing Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-12-02 00:40 +0100
Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 09:30 +0100
Re: stability level of testing David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-12-02 03:30 +0100
Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 10:00 +0100
Re: stability level of testing David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-12-03 06:10 +0100
Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-03 14:20 +0100
Re: stability level of testing Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-12-04 00:50 +0100
Re: stability level of testing "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-12-05 23:20 +0100
Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-06 09:10 +0100
csiph-web