Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #242608

Re: stability level of testing

From daggs <daggs@gmx.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: stability level of testing
Date 2021-12-02 09:30 +0100
Message-ID <DpPDA-5ls-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <DpsdY-7Yz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DpsQG-8qr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <DpERP-6Uh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DpFNU-7tJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DpHmG-8v3-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Greetings Charles,

> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2021 at 12:13 AM
> From: "Charles Curley" <charlescurley@charlescurley.com>
> To: "Debian Users" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Subject: Re: stability level of testing
>
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:51:08 +0100
> Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> > Current Debian stable 11 ("Bullseye") has not so old software and good
> > security support, consider using it for a server. You can search for
> > software versions using packages.debian.org
>
> Also, should you find you need more a recent version of something than
> the Bullseye version, you might find it in backports.
>
> And you can, Murphy help you, go from stable (Bullseye) to Testing. But
> I suggest that only as a last, desperate, resort.
>
> --
> Does anybody read signatures any more?
>
> https://charlescurley.com
> https://charlescurley.com/blog/
>
>

I know there are bps for kernel, are there for qemu and libvirt?

Thanks,

Dagg

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-01 08:30 +0100
  Re: stability level of testing Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> - 2021-12-01 09:10 +0100
    Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-01 22:00 +0100
      Re: stability level of testing Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> - 2021-12-01 23:00 +0100
        Re: stability level of testing Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-12-02 00:40 +0100
          Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 09:30 +0100
            Re: stability level of testing Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-12-02 15:50 +0100
              Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 18:50 +0100
        Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 09:30 +0100
          Re: stability level of testing "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-12-02 21:10 +0100
            Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 22:30 +0100
  Re: stability level of testing Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-12-02 00:40 +0100
    Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 09:30 +0100
  Re: stability level of testing David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-12-02 03:30 +0100
    Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-02 10:00 +0100
      Re: stability level of testing David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-12-03 06:10 +0100
        Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-03 14:20 +0100
          Re: stability level of testing Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-12-04 00:50 +0100
          Re: stability level of testing "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-12-05 23:20 +0100
            Re: stability level of testing daggs <daggs@gmx.com> - 2021-12-06 09:10 +0100

csiph-web