Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13736
| From | Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report |
| Date | 2021-11-27 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DoasO-2d0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DnZ4l-3Xw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Do6pb-852-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2021-11-27 08 h 54, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Sandro (2021.11.27_06:01:08_+0000) > >> Hello, >> while working on something else[1], i noticed how many of the >> repositories in the DPT salsa group are in poor shape: >> >> * missing branches >> * changes not pushed to salsa >> * general misalignment in configuration/setup/organization >> * many other small nuances >> >> [1] https://github.com/sandrotosi/debian-python-team-tracker > > +1 this is great! \0/ I've been wanting something for QA like that for a while, but never had the time / energy to look into it further. All in all, it's too easy to forget to push something to Salsa and never realise it. >> please take the content with caution, as it's still an early, raw >> draft (i spot-checked some of the reported issues, but there could be >> bugs/issues) and it contains data that can be outdated (see below re >> caching); the fact that the report indicates only 43 repos are without >> violations is a bit disarming, but i think the tool tries to err on >> the side of verbosity and pedantry, with 2 level of violations (ERROR >> and WARNING) to mark which ones are the most important that require >> immediate attention vs the nice-to-have ones. > > When we did the migration to git, there weren't good tools for managing > the setup of the salsa repos (hooks, etc.) yet. I'd assume those exist > now, we should check in with what other teams are doing. That stuff can > all be fixed in one run of a tool, I'd assume. Could this become part of the Debian Janitor at some point? I could see teams adding a per-team config file to check things like what branch names should be expected, etc. and the Janitor fixing all this if it has commit access. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 07:10 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2021-11-27 10:50 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 12:20 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 15:00 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 19:20 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-12-10 07:40 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-12-12 07:30 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 02:00 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-01-03 07:40 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-01-03 21:20 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 21:20 +0100
csiph-web