Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13772
| From | Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report |
| Date | 2021-12-10 07:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DsHJw-336-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DnZ4l-3Xw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Do6pb-852-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> When we did the migration to git, there weren't good tools for managing > the setup of the salsa repos (hooks, etc.) yet. I'd assume those exist > now, we should check in with what other teams are doing. That stuff can > all be fixed in one run of a tool, I'd assume. yeah i figured that much, and that made sense at that time. I modified [1] to automatically create the salsa repo enabling both KGB and tagpending webhooks, but the `salsa` tool doesnt support setting integrations, so that will need to be fixed later on. [1] https://github.com/sandrotosi/pypi2deb/tree/morph I'm in the process of writing a tool to uniform the repo configuration in python-team/package - add integration: Emails on push - remove integration Irker - add webhook: KGB (or edit to remove all the extra parameters set, which are the default values anyway) - add webhook: tagpending I'll write back here when i think it's ready for review and request authorization to run it. I think there's still one point we need to figure out: how to make these remarks known to the packages maintainers, instead of all of them just being in a text file. Thanks, -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 07:10 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2021-11-27 10:50 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 12:20 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 15:00 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 19:20 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-12-10 07:40 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-12-12 07:30 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 02:00 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-01-03 07:40 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-01-03 21:20 +0100
Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 21:20 +0100
csiph-web