Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1083430

Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?

From Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?
Date 2021-11-28 23:10 +0100
Message-ID <DoAnf-KX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <DmpPk-4DD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <DnPRn-6Hv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DoxSq-7RP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Di1sd-7oM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DoxSq-7RP-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 28 Nov 2021, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:

> After build-testing about half of the reverse dependencies, failures that 
> look new-pandas-related are cfgrib #1000726, joypy #1000727, python-skbio 
> #1000752, and maybe hyperspy (not filed yet).
>
> python-skbio and hyperspy already FTBFS for unrelated reasons (but fail more 
> tests with new pandas), and joypy looks trivially fixable.
>
> Given this and expecting to find a similar number in the other half, against 
> pandas 1.3 working on python3.10 while 1.1 doesn't (#1000422), would you 
> prefer to have pandas 1.3 in unstable now, or not?

My vote would be: go for it, but then again, I don't maintain any of 
pandas BDs.

Thanks,
Scott

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-10 20:30 +0100
  Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2021-11-21 07:40 +0100
    Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-21 12:10 +0100
      Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-21 17:00 +0100
        Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-22 23:20 +0100
          Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-26 21:20 +0100
            Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-28 20:20 +0100
              Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not? Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2021-11-28 23:10 +0100
              Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-29 22:00 +0100
                Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-12-09 23:00 +0100

csiph-web