Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13961
| From | Nilesh Patra <nilesh@riseup.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? |
| Date | 2022-02-17 22:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DRWci-2vmc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DRT4J-2tgC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DRV6x-2usV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <DRW2B-2v2M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2/18/22 2:23 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> I admit I'm hesitating a bit for different reasons. While I agree that >> direct commits are better than MRs I found several DPT packages with >> very sensible changes in Git but no uploads following these. For >> instance fixing VCS fields and Maintainer name should be followed by an >> according upload to make those changes visible to users and developers >> of the *packages* in Debian. >> >> In the Debian Med team for instance we do those automatic changes before >> uploading a package - say when upgrading to new upstream versions or >> fixing some bugs. Than we run the Janitor scripts and other automatic >> changes which is all done in routine-update. I personally find this >> workflow more convenient. That way Debian Med team (as well as pkg-r >> team) are blacklisted for Janitor to not have competing changes inside >> the package. > > thanks for bringing the perspective of how things are done in the Med > team, but it feels none of the points you mentioned nor the specific > Med team workflow apply here, I suppose the highlight was the usage of routine-update[1] package before upload and we could use it with DPT too. This does similar(same?) changes as in janitor. But that said, I agree with what you wrote: > or are relevant to just let Janitor > commit directly to our packages. I vote a in for/OK for janitor to commit directly as well. [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/routine-update Regards, Nilesh
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-02-17 18:50 +0100
Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-02-17 21:00 +0100
Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-02-17 22:00 +0100
Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Nilesh Patra <nilesh@riseup.net> - 2022-02-17 22:10 +0100
Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-02-19 14:30 +0100
Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-03-29 23:50 +0200
Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? stefanor@debian.org - 2022-05-24 12:40 +0200
Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org> - 2022-05-24 12:50 +0200
csiph-web