Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #245505

Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd

From Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd
Date 2022-02-17 16:40 +0100
Message-ID <DRR2V-2s3e-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <DOWLv-E6f-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DOXod-Ej2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <DOXRg-EJ2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DPTBT-1eL5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DRwrv-2fdH-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 16 Feb 2022, Lee wrote:

> On 2/12/22, Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Any idea what the chances are of getting an enhancement request for
>>> the dhcp client to add an
>>>  ignore option;
>>> that says not use the option given by the dhcp server?
>>>
>> isc-dhcp-client? zero.
>>
>> https://www.isc.org/dhcp/
>>
>> The client and relay portions of ISC DHCP are no longer maintained.
>
> *sigh*
> https://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/4.4.3b1/dhcp-4.4.3b1-RELNOTES
>  NOTE: The client and relay components are now End-Of-Life.
>  4.4.3 is the final release for those components.
>
> How does one figure out what the replacement dhcp client software is
> going to be?
>
I'll probably try dhcpcd5. I have vague memories of using it before,
don't recall why I changed (probably dhcpcd in those days)

>> It's on my todo list, along with ntp, to move to something else...
>
> I've seen references to chrony and ntpsec as replacements.
>

ntpsec is supposed to be an almost drop in replacement.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-08 21:10 +0100
  Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-02-08 21:30 +0100
    Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 15:30 +0100
      Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-02-09 16:10 +0100
        Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-02-09 16:50 +0100
          Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 17:20 +0100
            Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-02-09 17:50 +0100
            Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-02-09 18:10 +0100
            Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2022-02-12 07:00 +0100
              Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-16 18:40 +0100
                Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2022-02-17 16:40 +0100
                Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-19 15:30 +0100
        Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 17:10 +0100
          Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-02-09 17:50 +0100
      Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2022-02-09 16:10 +0100

csiph-web