Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #245555

Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd

From Lee <ler762@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd
Date 2022-02-19 15:30 +0100
Message-ID <DSyUh-2TNE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <DOXod-Ej2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <DOXRg-EJ2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DPTBT-1eL5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DRwrv-2fdH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DRR2V-2s3e-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/17/22, Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> wrote:
>>> It's on my todo list, along with ntp, to move to something else...
>>
>> I've seen references to chrony and ntpsec as replacements.
>
> ntpsec is supposed to be an almost drop in replacement.

If I'm interpreting the popcon pages right,
ntpsec     228 users
chrony    4686 users
ntp      47485 users
I'd much rather let someone else debug ntpsec.  ntp has been around
for ages, so while it might be hard to change I'm guessing most of the
bugs have been fixed by now.

If you haven't seen it, the "The future of src:ntp" thread on
debian-devel is worth a read.
tl-dr:  https://www.coreinfrastructure.org/blogs/securing-network-time/

If I wanted to replace whatever timekeeping software that comes with
systemd and _didn't_ want ntp, I'd pick chrony.

Regards,
Lee

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-08 21:10 +0100
  Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-02-08 21:30 +0100
    Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 15:30 +0100
      Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-02-09 16:10 +0100
        Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-02-09 16:50 +0100
          Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 17:20 +0100
            Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-02-09 17:50 +0100
            Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-02-09 18:10 +0100
            Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2022-02-12 07:00 +0100
              Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-16 18:40 +0100
                Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2022-02-17 16:40 +0100
                Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-19 15:30 +0100
        Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 17:10 +0100
          Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-02-09 17:50 +0100
      Re: systemd/dhcp v. ntpd Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2022-02-09 16:10 +0100

csiph-web