Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #244544
| From | Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? |
| Date | 2022-01-24 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DJfnQ-1Xx-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DIoCR-3Ln-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DIxd8-rG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <DIIid-7bW-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DIZVM-16D-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> wrote on 24/01/2022 at 06:15:12+0100: > January 23, 2022 11:21:31 AM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" <peb@debian.org> wrote: > >> I wonder if these bugs aren't also impacting chromium? I did not have >> time to look into it so I may be wrong. > > But of course they were. Otherwise why would Debian fix them, after a > long wait? Why would it list them on its security-tracker? Have you > thought of that at all? Have you read the sentence you're quoting at all? >> Now that I read the press release paragraph and the reference to >> Pocock's "excommunication", I start wondering if Max, who never >> wrote on any Debian List before last month is yet another trollesque >> incarnation of the forementioned Pocock. > > M-W defines it as "exclusion from fellowship in a group or community", > so I think that word was perfect. It seems odd of you to question my > command of English, all things considered. The cambridge dictionary defines it as "the act of refusing to to allow someone to be involved in the Church". I don't know what M-W stands for, but for English definitions, I'll stick with Cambridge University Press' work. > And no, I'm not Pocock. He seems to be obsessed with certain alleged > misdeeds of sexual nature. I never brought those up. Your accusation > is baseless. Wondering is not accusing. > And if I were Pocock, what would be the master plan, according to you? > Get more people to try to learn about who the heck he is? Debian has > already done that. I didn't know about who this guy was until I read > that press release and googled him. Talk about the Streisand > effect. So, again, what was the plan, according to you? How would I know? I'm not on anyone's head except mine. -- PEB
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-22 14:30 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2022-01-22 14:50 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-24 04:50 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2022-01-22 15:30 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-01-22 16:00 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-24 05:30 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2022-01-24 07:10 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-24 07:10 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2022-01-24 07:40 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-24 22:50 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2022-01-22 20:10 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-01-22 20:30 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2022-01-22 23:40 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-23 11:30 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-24 06:20 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-24 22:50 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2022-01-25 04:20 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-24 07:50 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-01-25 10:00 +0100
Re: Why is Debian not telling the truth about its security fixes? Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2022-01-25 10:40 +0100
csiph-web