Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #243691
| From | "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com |
| Date | 2022-01-04 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DBWSZ-hr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <DBEjo-5DJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DBFp7-6fB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DBFyN-6yp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <DBFyN-6yp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DBWzE-b4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 1/4/22 10:19 AM, Michael Stone wrote: > And this is why putting stuff into /etc/hosts is basically never the > right answer. :) Au contraire! Among other things, the host table is the best possible place to block access to certain unwanted domains. For example, if you add these entries: > 0.0.0.0 facebook.com > 0.0.0.0 www.facebook.com > 0.0.0.0 hi-in.facebook.com > 0.0.0.0 gl-es.facebook.com > 0.0.0.0 twitter.com > 0.0.0.0 www.twitter.com you can never be tricked into accessing Facebook or Twitter (for me, ONCE is far too many times), and if you add > 0.0.0.0 bing.com then bing-redirections will fail every time (and alert you to their noisome and all-too-common presence). And likewise, you might want to access other machines within your LAN by name, but your operation is not big enough to warrant bothering with an internal DNS, or you might need to access outside systems that, for various perfectly legitimate reasons, are kept off the public DNS. -- JHHL
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:10 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 23:20 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:20 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Mark Allums <maa@allums.com> - 2022-01-03 23:40 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-04 00:30 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 01:00 +0100
[SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 01:10 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 19:20 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2022-01-04 19:40 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 19:40 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 21:30 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 19:40 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-01-04 20:40 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 21:00 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-01-04 22:10 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-05 06:20 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-01-05 14:50 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-05 18:30 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-01-05 18:50 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-05 19:50 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-01-05 22:00 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2022-01-04 21:00 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-04 22:30 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-05 06:20 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-05 13:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 19:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2022-01-03 23:40 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 00:30 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2022-01-04 00:40 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2022-01-04 00:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 00:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com RP <reyadmin@gmail.com> - 2022-01-04 00:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 07:00 +0100
[SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 13:00 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 13:20 +0100
GUIs (was: Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2022-01-04 15:00 +0100
Re: GUIs (was: Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 16:30 +0100
csiph-web