Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #243702
| From | Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com |
| Date | 2022-01-04 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DBZxv-1VG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <DBFyN-6yp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <DBFyN-6yp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DBWzE-b4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <DBWT0-hr-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <DBXP3-QH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
David Wright wrote: > On Tue 04 Jan 2022 at 19:37:34 (+0100), tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:19:37PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > And this is why putting stuff into /etc/hosts is basically never the right > > > answer. :) > > > > Eye, beholder and things. I've got a couple of them like so: > > > > # Pest: > > 127.0.0.1 www.google-analytics.com > > 127.0.0.1 ajax.google.com > > 127.0.0.1 ad.doublecklick.net > > 127.0.0.1 www.gstatic.com > > ... > > > > Yeah, some things stop working then. I want them to :) > > Agreed. I append a list of close to 14,000 addresses (including > comments) to the end of my own local /etc/hosts. I see very > few adverts. In fact, I was quite shocked when I just tried > DNS over HTTPS for a couple of minutes. The 10-day weather > profile that I screenshoot every day was plastered in popups. > > Anyone know how to combine DoH with resolving 14,000 addresses > to 127.0.0.1? Also, does that mean that DoH attempts to resolve > my local hosts before consulting /etc/hosts? I didn't stick > around DoH long enough to find out. Here's what I do: My local DNS resolver offers DNS, DNS over TLS, and DNS over HTTPS. I supply a use-application-dns.net zone that returns NXDOMAIN. That tells browsers to not use DoH. I build an adblocker zone via a script that grabs several public lists, and those all return an address that is answered by a web server that always answers with a 204 (No Content, success). That's where you get to put your 14,000 addresses. The adblocker zone gets rebuilt when I feel like it; otherwise, I could put in a cron job to update it once a month or so. -dsr-
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:10 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 23:20 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:20 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Mark Allums <maa@allums.com> - 2022-01-03 23:40 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-04 00:30 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 01:00 +0100
[SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 01:10 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 19:20 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2022-01-04 19:40 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 19:40 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 21:30 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 19:40 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-01-04 20:40 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 21:00 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-01-04 22:10 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-05 06:20 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-01-05 14:50 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-05 18:30 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-01-05 18:50 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-05 19:50 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-01-05 22:00 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2022-01-04 21:00 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-04 22:30 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-05 06:20 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-05 13:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 19:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2022-01-03 23:40 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2022-01-03 23:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 00:30 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2022-01-04 00:40 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2022-01-04 00:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 00:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com RP <reyadmin@gmail.com> - 2022-01-04 00:50 +0100
Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 07:00 +0100
[SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-04 13:00 +0100
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 13:20 +0100
GUIs (was: Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2022-01-04 15:00 +0100
Re: GUIs (was: Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-04 16:30 +0100
csiph-web