Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #241145
| From | Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: A real bounce between GMX and bendel.debian.org |
| Date | 2021-10-11 03:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <D6RZf-3yd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <D6NsB-IZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/10/2021 17:18, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > although i seem not to be worth to be targeted by our bounce assassin, > my mail provider and bendel.debian.org are at odds enough to produce > a real bounce message, which then causes a warning mail from > listmaster@lists.debian.org . > > I am trying to make sense out of the given bounce report > > https://lists.debian.org/bounces/79gUBBa56gHKY3wtHzNKdg > > It is hard to distinguish the hearsay by bendel.debian.org from the > message parts which come from my provider's server mx00.emig.gmx.net. > Especially i wonder from where bendel takes the association to my > mail address (and which mentionings show its conclusions about my > address). > > Whatever, the reason for the bounce is that GMX accuses debian-user > of not meeting its requirements > https://www.gmx.net/mail/senderguidelines > All points there look like they are not volatile problems but rather > persistent ones. But listmaster@lists.debian.org wrote i had >> 1 bounce out of 68 mails in one day (1%, kick-score is 80%) > So why did the other 67 succeed ? That seems unrelated to the OVH bounces. My mailserver bounced the same email (and I got a warning like that). Since I run my own mailserver, and can look at the logs and see exactly why it has been rejected, and here's what I got: 2021-10-10 16:07:37 1mZeAb-0005Mc-Hn H=bendel.debian.org [2001:41b8:202:deb:216:36ff:fe40:4002] X=TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256 CV=no F=<bounce-debian-user=eduardo=kalinowski.com.br@lists.debian.org> rejected after DATA: header syntax (malformed address: >\n may not follow Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= <peb@debian.org>: failing address in "From:" header is: Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= <peb@debian.org>>): malformed address: >\n may not follow Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= <peb@debian.org>: failing address in "From:" header is: Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= <peb@debian.org>> And this is From header: From: Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9cue?= <peb@debian.org>> (There does seem to be an extra > in there.) In this case, my server bounced a mail, and so the listserver is correct in sending me that notification. And since it was just one email, I did not get unsubscribed. However, perhaps the listserver should have not accepted that email with the (possibly) invalid From header in the first place.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A real bounce between GMX and bendel.debian.org "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-10-10 22:20 +0200
Re: A real bounce between GMX and bendel.debian.org "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-10-10 22:50 +0200
Re: A real bounce between GMX and bendel.debian.org Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2021-10-11 03:10 +0200
Re: A real bounce between GMX and bendel.debian.org "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-10-11 10:20 +0200
Re: A real bounce between GMX and bendel.debian.org Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-10-11 14:00 +0200
Re: A real bounce between GMX and bendel.debian.org Cord Beermann <cord@debian.org> - 2021-10-13 11:20 +0200
Re: A real bounce between GMX and bendel.debian.org Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-10-11 09:50 +0200
Re: A real bounce between GMX and bendel.debian.org Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-10-11 12:50 +0200
csiph-web