Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373521

Re: test

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: test
Date 2016-09-29 17:23 -0700
Message-ID <D412FEA0.7EE53%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <ed2dnQ_IXZifO3HKnZ2dnUU7-UXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <nsiv8b$at9$1@dont-email.me> <YIidnbYIFsPrtXDKnZ2dnUU7-anNnZ2d@giganews.com> <D412873A.7ED5F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nsk9qe$4fd$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 9/29/16, 4:58 PM, in article nsk9qe$4fd$1@dont-email.me, "Horace McSwain"
<spyderwingnut@techie.com> wrote:

... 
>>> So as you can see this is super kludge. It doesn't test anything. And it's
>>> not very interactive. Essentially I write a text file called, file.txt in
>>> vim. If needed I format it.
>>> 
>> Excellent! Very cool test to see if Owl was just trolling me or if he will
>> troll anyone who makes a quick script that does not test for errors and the
>> like.
>> 
>> I suspect you are having the same thought I am: Owl will NOT troll you over
>> it. He will accept your code just fine.
>> 
>> Of course, their are two differences here:
>> 
>> 1) You are of the herd. The herd defends the herd and trolls others. I am the
>> "William Shatner" to your herd-like group, so you guys cannot stop yourself
>> from begging for my attention. <https://goo.gl/ZMXDjt>
>> 
>> 2) Owl likely understands your script better... where with mine I was using a
>> scripting language and a scripting model he did not understand at all. He was
>> completely lost on what was meant by "window 1" and, if he understand at all
>> even now, it is only because I was able to show him in a way that would be
>> MUCH harder to show on Linux: <https://youtu.be/ymE184jYNnk>. Again (and to
>> make sure Owl does understand): it is the terminal's window 1 and ONLY the
>> terminal's window 1 which I highlight (and enlarge) in that video... and ANY
>> message sent to the highlighted window is being sent to window 1, no matter
>> how it is referenced.
>> 
> Octavian has no clue what he is doing. Early on in the thread he got mixed up
> and posted incorrect information but rather than admitting it he kept
> attacking in order to cover up his massive noob errors.

I think he knows about other scripting and can be knowledgable... though he
has not been able to complete ANY of my challenges / tasks. But, yes, in
this case he got himself completely turned around and kept thinking the
terminal's windows were not the terminal's but the windows of the scripts
from which they were being referenced.

> You taught him something with your reply but he will never acknowledge that.
> He runs away instead.

Well, I think with my last video to him where I show with highlights and
zooming EXACTLY which window is terminal's window 1 he MIGHT get it... which
is why he is not responding.

<https://youtu.be/ymE184jYNnk>

Heck, since then, just to play, I have improved the way I reference those
windows (based on things Sandman taught me). Works great... so appreciate
Sandman's education on that (though even with that he felt the need to
troll... a shame).


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 03:58 +0000
  Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 04:18 +0000
    Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 04:39 +0000
      Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 04:41 +0000
        Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 05:10 +0000
          Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 05:26 +0000
            Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 07:51 -0400
              Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 14:43 +0000
                Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 08:54 -0700
                Re: test Horace McSwain <spyderwingnut@techie.com> - 2016-09-29 23:58 +0000
                Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 00:42 +0000
                Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:48 -0700
                Re: test William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-09-30 10:39 +0100
                Re: test Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 11:55 +0200
                Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 10:19 -0400
                Re: test Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:54 +0200
                Re: test chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 06:54 -0500
                Re: test William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-09-30 13:07 +0100
                Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 15:13 +0000
                Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:20 -0700
                Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 15:11 +0000
                Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:01 -0400
                Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:20 -0700
                Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:23 -0700
              Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 15:17 +0000
                Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 12:22 -0400
                Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 17:15 +0000
                Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 13:36 -0400
                Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 20:45 +0000
                Re: Sample Video Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 21:24 +0000
                Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-01 23:10 -0600
                Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-01 23:28 -0600
                Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-02 05:43 +0000
                Re: test Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-02 07:35 +0000
                Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 10:12 -0600
                Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-02 07:50 -0700
                Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 12:07 -0400
                Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-02 09:10 -0700
                Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 10:14 -0600
                Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 12:23 -0400
                Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 13:43 -0600
              Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 08:26 -0700
  Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 21:03 -0700

csiph-web