Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373383
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: test |
| Date | 2016-09-29 08:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D412873A.7ED5F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <0LCdnTa-lub3BnHKnZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> <nghhdd83.jgi@perch.invalid> <ed2dnQ_IXZifO3HKnZ2dnUU7-UXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <nsiv8b$at9$1@dont-email.me> <YIidnbYIFsPrtXDKnZ2dnUU7-anNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 9/29/16, 7:43 AM, in article
YIidnbYIFsPrtXDKnZ2dnUU7-anNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny"
<marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> On 2016-09-29, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-09-29 1:26 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>> On 2016-09-29, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-09-29, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-09-29, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> This is a sample
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sample reply.
>>>>>
>>>>> I write a really simple script to help me do this quickly. I'll
>>>>> refine it tomorrow. It's still a bit of work, and I am sure
>>>>> lazy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, this will drive snit up a wall.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have vallor's public key. So I removed him from the
>>>>> group, what is his key ID so I can add it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> anon@lowtide:~$ gpg --list-keys vallor pub 1024D/1654068E
>>>> 2003-11-18 uid vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> sub
>>>> 1024g/086FD476 2003-11-18
>>>>
>>>> anon@lowtide:~$
>>>
>>> I can see where I need to do a little more automation. I added
>>> valor. And my only concern is what happens if they reply to this
>>> from within Thunderbird. Will it simply encrypt for them or will it
>>> undo it and then show it to everyone in the group.
>>>
>>> Pretty cool so far.
>>
>> I can answer that question. I'm using Thunderbird with Enigmail for
>> this group and it basically won't allow me to reply with an encrypted
>> message as it warns me that I am about to post to a newsgroup.
>> However, if there is a newsreader for Windows which disregards that, I
>> will gladly switch to it and continue to post encrypted content.
>
> When I get home tonight or over the weekend I'll work on a simple
> script. Right now all I have done is I am using a simple case statement
> to execute owl's command, which I turned into an array of arguments.
>
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> arg="$1"
> cmd="gpg"
> doit=("-r" "cola" "--armor" "--output" "encrypted.asc" "--encrypt" "file.txt")
> undoit=("--output" "file.txt" "--decrypt" "encrypted.asc")
>
> case "$arg" in
> encrypt )
> $cmd "${doit[@]}"
> ;;
> decrypt )
> $cmd "${undoit[@]}"
> ;;
> * )
> echo "use encrypt or decrypt"
> exit 1
> ;;
> esac
>
> ## end
>
> So as you can see this is super kludge. It doesn't test anything. And
> it's not very interactive. Essentially I write a text file called,
> file.txt in vim. If needed I format it.
Excellent! Very cool test to see if Owl was just trolling me or if he will
troll anyone who makes a quick script that does not test for errors and the
like.
I suspect you are having the same thought I am: Owl will NOT troll you over
it. He will accept your code just fine.
Of course, their are two differences here:
1) You are of the herd. The herd defends the herd and trolls others. I am
the "William Shatner" to your herd-like group, so you guys cannot stop
yourself from begging for my attention. <https://goo.gl/ZMXDjt>
2) Owl likely understands your script better... where with mine I was using
a scripting language and a scripting model he did not understand at all. He
was completely lost on what was meant by "window 1" and, if he understand at
all even now, it is only because I was able to show him in a way that would
be MUCH harder to show on Linux: <https://youtu.be/ymE184jYNnk>. Again (and
to make sure Owl does understand): it is the terminal's window 1 and ONLY
the terminal's window 1 which I highlight (and enlarge) in that video... and
ANY message sent to the highlighted window is being sent to window 1, no
matter how it is referenced.
...
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 03:58 +0000
Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 04:18 +0000
Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 04:39 +0000
Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 04:41 +0000
Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 05:10 +0000
Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 05:26 +0000
Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 07:51 -0400
Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 14:43 +0000
Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 08:54 -0700
Re: test Horace McSwain <spyderwingnut@techie.com> - 2016-09-29 23:58 +0000
Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 00:42 +0000
Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:48 -0700
Re: test William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-09-30 10:39 +0100
Re: test Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 11:55 +0200
Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 10:19 -0400
Re: test Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:54 +0200
Re: test chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 06:54 -0500
Re: test William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-09-30 13:07 +0100
Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 15:13 +0000
Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:20 -0700
Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 15:11 +0000
Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:01 -0400
Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:20 -0700
Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:23 -0700
Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 15:17 +0000
Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 12:22 -0400
Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 17:15 +0000
Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 13:36 -0400
Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 20:45 +0000
Re: Sample Video Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 21:24 +0000
Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-01 23:10 -0600
Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-01 23:28 -0600
Re: test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-02 05:43 +0000
Re: test Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-02 07:35 +0000
Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 10:12 -0600
Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-02 07:50 -0700
Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 12:07 -0400
Re: test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-02 09:10 -0700
Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 10:14 -0600
Re: test Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 12:23 -0400
Re: test GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 13:43 -0600
Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 08:26 -0700
Re: test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 21:03 -0700
csiph-web