Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #240485
| From | Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums |
| Date | 2021-09-28 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <D2nn4-71b-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <D2eMO-1L6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <D2jjr-4D4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 07:10:08AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >As the original poster, I can say this hits the nail on the head. Most >definitely, Andy Smith and others claim a right to call newcomers like >me a laughingstock, damned, etc., on the basis of their supposed >god-like status. ... >By overreaction, he clearly means I refused to worship him and his ilk >as the gods they think they are, I think this is an unreasonable characterisation of Andy Smith which I invite you to retract. I've read all of his messages on this subject to this list (at least) and I thought he'd taken great pains to make clear that he was merely an interested bystander, no more important than anyone else -- including you! >My bug is marked as patch available. But I am not Google or Amazon. So >I doubt my patch for my bug will ever make it into the distribution. There is ample evidence that patches and contributions coming from people who are not part of MegaCorps are regularly and routinely welcomed. The argument you are trying to put forward here is a strange straw man. >Apparently I have committed the deadly sin of questioning the gods. If >Debian wants to prove me wrong, then Debian should accept my patch into >the distribution The psychology in play here (If Debian doesn't accept my patch...) is laughably transparent. I don't speak for the Xen maintainers. As a general principle, Debian maintainers weigh contributions with a number of factors. One of those factors is to what extent the Contributor is someone who the maintainer can have a constructive working relationship with. It's a strength of the project, IMHO, that technical excellence doesn't overrule the other factors. So, even if your patch is technically excellent (and I have not studied it to make that assertion), you should bear in mind your other interactions with the project -- including your unreasonable and ongoing mischaracterisation of Andy Smith and others -- is highly relevant. > or at least consider it >and have the courtesy to tell me why they can't or won't accept the >patch. I'm sorry, neither the Xen maintainers nor any other contributors, be they volunteers or otherwise, owe you *anything*. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland ✎ jmtd@debian.org 🔗 https://jmtd.net
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Borden <borden_c@tutanota.com> - 2021-09-28 08:30 +0200
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-28 10:30 +0200
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Chuck Zmudzinski <brchuckz@netscape.net> - 2021-09-28 13:20 +0200
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2021-09-28 16:40 +0200
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-28 17:40 +0200
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 02:50 +0200
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-30 13:00 +0200
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 21:50 +0200
csiph-web