Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13456
| From | Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs |
| Date | 2021-06-28 04:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CuPvs-34b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Cu0VX-4MG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Cuprl-3fO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hola everybody, On 6/26/21 7:51 PM, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > To me, the most important thing is that all packages must at least run > the upstream testsuite when it exists (I'm planning on writing a policy > proposal saying this after the freeze). If PyPi releases include them, I > think it's fine (but they often don't). I was a little surprised because in all discussion anyone take account the tests (or if a missed sorry) thanks pollo to get it in discussion. I don't have the correct numbers but I saw many python package without autopkgtest, and if we package from PyPi, that don't contain the testsuite, that result in packages with any test, and that isn't good. Also, I'm not sure, but the docs aren't in PyPi, isn't? In the other hand, files like .git* or CI files, can be easily remove it. So, I don't see any problems with that. cheers -- Emmanuel Arias @eamanu yaerobi.com
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-25 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-25 23:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2021-06-25 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 00:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 00:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-26 01:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 02:10 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 04:10 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-26 06:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 11:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 12:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 04:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 00:10 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 01:10 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-26 02:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Brian Thompson <brian@hashvault.io> - 2021-06-26 05:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2021-06-26 06:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 04:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2021-06-27 01:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-27 02:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2021-06-28 04:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-28 18:30 +0200
csiph-web