Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13456

Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs

From Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs
Date 2021-06-28 04:50 +0200
Message-ID <CuPvs-34b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Cu0VX-4MG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Cuprl-3fO-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hola everybody,

On 6/26/21 7:51 PM, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> To me, the most important thing is that all packages must at least run
> the upstream testsuite when it exists (I'm planning on writing a policy
> proposal saying this after the freeze). If PyPi releases include them, I
> think it's fine (but they often don't).

I was a little surprised because in all discussion anyone take account
the tests (or if a missed sorry) thanks pollo to get it in discussion. I
don't have the correct numbers but I saw  many python package without
autopkgtest, and if we package from PyPi, that don't contain the
testsuite, that result in packages with any test, and that isn't good.

Also, I'm not sure, but the docs aren't in PyPi, isn't?

In the other hand, files like .git* or CI files, can be easily remove
it. So, I don't see any problems with that.

cheers

-- 
Emmanuel Arias
@eamanu
yaerobi.com

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-25 22:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-25 23:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2021-06-25 23:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 00:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 00:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-26 01:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 02:10 +0200
        Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 04:10 +0200
          Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-26 06:20 +0200
          Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 11:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 12:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 04:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 00:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 01:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-26 02:00 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Brian Thompson <brian@hashvault.io> - 2021-06-26 05:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2021-06-26 06:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 04:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2021-06-27 01:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-27 02:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2021-06-28 04:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-28 18:30 +0200

csiph-web