Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13456

Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs
Date Mon, 28 Jun 2021 04:50:02 +0200
Message-ID <CuPvs-34b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Cu0VX-4MG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Cuprl-3fO-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jun 28 02:49:38 2021
Old-Return-Path <eamanu@yaerobi.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12.001 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .yaerobi. - helo: .mail-pf1-x42f.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM5324bvVOub3t4I4B5J/NMSnpTsfuLZg6M9Z+0FPow0bpL+oE6KnC 7z84+ofUy40H8nQq5LXc5ol27tc8BDKkDd2k
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJy4GFr7wxTCeQ71W0Mdr+gnnByo0hfAcxOXRkUmOSFDbPSG4BGWYZAkbkEV6v6MFRoCta8FBg==
X-Received by 2002:a62:3344:0:b029:28c:6f0f:cb90 with SMTP id z65-20020a6233440000b029028c6f0fcb90mr22285424pfz.58.1624848562015; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 19:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2vGImQsfJC6M2M8PvWdhlR6uXfW5sIks1"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19246
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/33e6f093-211c-bf62-51a7-7faa120d34ee@yaerobi.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 213
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sun, 27 Jun 2021 23:49:18 -0300
X-Original-Message-ID <33e6f093-211c-bf62-51a7-7faa120d34ee@yaerobi.com>
X-Original-References <877dihvfp9.fsf@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net> <4ec3ce8d-eecd-211a-b141-6105b1fc0ff4@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13456

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hola everybody,

On 6/26/21 7:51 PM, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> To me, the most important thing is that all packages must at least run
> the upstream testsuite when it exists (I'm planning on writing a policy
> proposal saying this after the freeze). If PyPi releases include them, I
> think it's fine (but they often don't).

I was a little surprised because in all discussion anyone take account
the tests (or if a missed sorry) thanks pollo to get it in discussion. I
don't have the correct numbers but I saw  many python package without
autopkgtest, and if we package from PyPi, that don't contain the
testsuite, that result in packages with any test, and that isn't good.

Also, I'm not sure, but the docs aren't in PyPi, isn't?

In the other hand, files like .git* or CI files, can be easily remove
it. So, I don't see any problems with that.

cheers

-- 
Emmanuel Arias
@eamanu
yaerobi.com

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-25 22:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-25 23:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2021-06-25 23:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 00:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 00:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-26 01:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 02:10 +0200
        Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 04:10 +0200
          Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-26 06:20 +0200
          Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 11:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 12:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 04:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 00:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 01:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-26 02:00 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Brian Thompson <brian@hashvault.io> - 2021-06-26 05:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2021-06-26 06:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-06-26 04:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2021-06-27 01:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-27 02:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2021-06-28 04:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided  upstream source tarballs Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-06-28 18:30 +0200

csiph-web