Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #236383

Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls"

From Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls"
Date 2021-06-23 20:30 +0200
Message-ID <CtfNn-1bA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CtbJM-7kC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ctc38-7qI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ctcmu-7x4-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mi, 23 iun 21, 16:43:51, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2021-06-23 10:27:01 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 03:59:51PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> 
> > > $ ls /etc/systemd
> > > ls: cannot open directory '/etc/systemd': No such file or directory
> > > 
> > > Any explanation???
> > 
> > If it's ext4, then my guess is "corrupted file system, fsck it".
> > 
> > If it's btrfs or zfs, then my guess is "btrfs or zfs voodoo, consult
> > a shaman".
> 
> And aufs?

An astrologist.

(sorry, could not resist)

Is this a new issue? If it worked before, what changed since then?

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:10 +0200
  Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2021-06-23 16:20 +0200
    Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:20 +0200
  Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-06-23 16:20 +0200
    Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:30 +0200
      Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-06-23 16:50 +0200
      Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:50 +0200
        Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-06-23 16:50 +0200
  Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-06-23 16:30 +0200
    Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:50 +0200
      Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-06-23 20:30 +0200
        Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 22:50 +0200
          Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-25 12:40 +0200
  Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2021-06-23 19:30 +0200

csiph-web