Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #236437

Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls"

From Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls"
Date 2021-06-25 12:40 +0200
Message-ID <CtRpD-7tw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CtbJM-7kC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ctc38-7qI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ctcmu-7x4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CtfNn-1bA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <CthYR-2oq-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2021-06-23 22:47:40 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2021-06-23 21:24:43 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Is this a new issue?
> 
> I don't know. The machine had been reinstalled in January. But
> since this reinstallation, I haven't tried to log in until today
> (I was using it only via job submissions).

FYI, the machines have now been reinstalled. It seems that aufs is
unreliable. There have already been problems in the last few years.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:10 +0200
  Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2021-06-23 16:20 +0200
    Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:20 +0200
  Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-06-23 16:20 +0200
    Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:30 +0200
      Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-06-23 16:50 +0200
      Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:50 +0200
        Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-06-23 16:50 +0200
  Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-06-23 16:30 +0200
    Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 16:50 +0200
      Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-06-23 20:30 +0200
        Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-23 22:50 +0200
          Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-06-25 12:40 +0200
  Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls" Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2021-06-23 19:30 +0200

csiph-web