Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #101676
| From | Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams |
| Date | 2021-09-12 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CWB9o-37V-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CT3xg-4QP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 11:38:35PM +0100, Phil Morrell wrote: >... > 4. When 2 or 3 are too onerous to maintain, the package MAY use the > convenience copy but MUST document why in README.source and SHOULD be > included in the [security-tracker]. >... The package MUST be listed as being without security support in the debian-security-support package and the Release Notes, and it MUST NOT be installed as part of a default installation, unless the security team has explicitly agreed to support it. If we are shipping software where Debian cannot provide security support, then we shouldn't hide the problem from our users. cu Adrian
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2021-09-03 00:40 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> - 2021-09-03 01:20 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2021-09-03 03:10 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2021-09-03 17:30 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-09-03 02:50 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2021-09-03 03:40 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-09-03 05:00 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> - 2021-09-03 18:50 +0200
Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-09-03 11:30 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-09-03 05:30 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams "Bastien Roucariès" <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> - 2021-09-03 10:20 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2021-09-12 19:20 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2021-09-15 17:40 +0200
csiph-web