Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #101527
| From | Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams |
| Date | 2021-09-03 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CTky6-7Rw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CT3xg-4QP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <CT5z3-65c-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <CT6lr-6C5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CT7AR-7rd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2021, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 3 8:22:51 AM IST, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>ൽ എഴുതി >I am very worried about how complex node-* packages in Debian have >become since ftpmasters explicitly stated a not-too-small rule and we >began more aggressively embedding. E.g. version of each embedded >project is hidden by default, and those packages manually adding virtual >packages has no mechanism to ensure that versions don't jump backwards >or disappear due to a typos. Apparently reducing package metadata size is more important than every other consideration. It has become very difficult to get new people into js team after we started embedding as the complexity has increased very much from earlier days. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2021-09-03 00:40 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> - 2021-09-03 01:20 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2021-09-03 03:10 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2021-09-03 17:30 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-09-03 02:50 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2021-09-03 03:40 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-09-03 05:00 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> - 2021-09-03 18:50 +0200
Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-09-03 11:30 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-09-03 05:30 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams "Bastien Roucariès" <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> - 2021-09-03 10:20 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2021-09-12 19:20 +0200
Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> - 2021-09-15 17:40 +0200
csiph-web