Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #28122

Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string

Subject Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded
References (22 earlier) <ece589da-9139-4aaf-8810-7a45ec969a00@googlegroups.com> <ZBOpD.380767$8C.89273@fx25.am4> <568d47fe-319c-4472-9660-061d1e582ba8@googlegroups.com> <zXPpD.253058$9v.28055@fx28.am4> <082a2cc9-8f1f-456e-a95e-f71b3fc54cde@googlegroups.com>
From Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk>
Message-ID <C8SpD.471206$Hv.28872@fx27.am4> (permalink)
Organization virginmedia.com
Date 2018-09-23 20:50 +0100

Show all headers | View raw


On 23/09/18 20:05, julio@diegidio.name wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 September 2018 19:20:35 UTC+2, Tom Gardner  wrote:
>> On 23/09/18 16:56, julio@diegidio.name wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 23 September 2018 17:49:17 UTC+2, Tom Gardner  wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/18 16:41, julio@diegidio.name wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, 23 September 2018 17:06:44 UTC+2, Tom Gardner  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is hard enough to get developers to write tests that
>>>>>> adequately test "happy days" (?daze?) normal operation.
>>>>>> Getting them to develop good tests for fault conditions
>>>>>> is more difficult.
>>>>>
>>>>> And beside the point anyway, while a (good) spec is supposed to cover all
>>>>> relevant cases to begin with: replied the developer.
>>>>
>>>> Good luck getting the customer to specify all the relevant
>>>> fault conditions!
>>>
>>> That's just not the customer's job! It's rather called (good) analysis:
>>> replied again the developer, though conscious of the decades of relentless
>>> demolition campaigns of analysis to begin with... i.e. of the very premise
>>> for doing any job properly (and for taking responsibility for results).
>>
>> Ah. Someone that hasn't experienced the religious
>> varieties of XP/Agile methodology!
> 
> I hope you are kidding, or the one who is still not doing the proverbial
> two plus two is just you.

Regrettably I'm not kidding, but the emphasis in
my statement is on "religious".

Agile/XP - when applied correctly and sensibly - does
have some advantages and can work.


>> Apart from the religious zealots, is /anyone/ surprised
>> that XP/Agile has some disadvantages?
> 
> That's too weak even as an euphemism.
> 
> The so called democratisation of programming, 

Democratisation isn't the word I would use. I would
probably use "downskilling".

The problem is that there is a limited supply of people
that are skilled and can think and have experience. And
aren't too expensive.


> when suddenly from being few
> top notch professionals we were flooded by hordes of clueless bullshitters,
> was immediately followed by the vendors and then the consultancies and then
> the self-appointed gurus launching their band-wagons: 

Exactly. Full stop.

Those are the <expletive deleteds> that push the religion,
so they can say "oh no wonder it failed, you only did 11
of the 12 necessary things".

That isn't limited to programming. Politicians are adept
at it (e.g. excuses for Brexit being a clusterfuck), and
town planners (e.g. "share spaced" "reduced demarcation"
zones).


> initially as pure tool
> based development, later as the nonsense that they have dared call agile (true
> agility is a good thing but it is just something else).  And these speculations
> have not just been selling broken solutions to an entire industry for decades
> now, these speculations have systematically denied and lied about the very state
> of the art since day one, because only by defaming and lying about the state of
> the art they could ever get away with so much unmitigated crap!  Indeed, sorry
> for all this nonsense: I am a "just" a developer...  Yet people keep buying
> into it, because so is the human race nowadays: demented.

Yes.


>> Main technical problem in uninteresting jobs :)
> 
> You choose your job...  The gigantic technical and social and economic costs
> are in the complete fuck up of the entire software industry.  And we all pay.

All but one of my jobs were very interesting; somehow I managed
to make some luck for myself :)

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

arm-gcc: pointer to constant string pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 09:50 +0200
  Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-14 11:18 +0200
    Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 13:05 +0200
      Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-14 13:25 +0200
  Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Nils M Holm <nmh@ananda.local> - 2018-09-14 09:47 +0000
    Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-14 12:26 +0200
      Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2018-09-14 14:52 +0200
        Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-14 16:04 +0200
          Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-14 15:48 +0100
            Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-14 17:02 +0200
              Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-14 18:45 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-14 20:37 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-14 20:51 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-15 16:24 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-15 17:28 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2018-09-16 13:58 +1000
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-16 08:42 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-16 08:47 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2018-09-16 20:18 +1000
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-16 12:25 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2018-09-16 22:22 +1000
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-16 15:00 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-16 14:33 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-16 22:06 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-16 21:42 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-09-17 21:24 -0500
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-18 08:49 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-09-21 22:15 -0500
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-22 11:53 +0200
                Testing (Was: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string) Jacob Sparre Andersen <jacob@jacob-sparre.dk> - 2018-09-22 12:16 +0200
                Re: Testing (Was: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-22 13:31 +0200
                Re: Testing (Was: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string) Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2018-09-23 09:26 +1000
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2018-09-22 20:06 +0300
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-23 14:39 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-09-22 13:50 -0500
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-23 15:21 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string julio@diegidio.name - 2018-09-23 08:41 -0700
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-23 16:49 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string julio@diegidio.name - 2018-09-23 08:56 -0700
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-23 18:20 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string julio@diegidio.name - 2018-09-23 12:05 -0700
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-23 20:50 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-09-23 12:04 -0500
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-23 18:27 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-23 19:37 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Jacob Sparre Andersen <jacob@jacob-sparre.dk> - 2018-09-24 12:53 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-24 13:49 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-09-28 20:17 -0500
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-09-18 08:32 +0100
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-18 10:02 +0200
                Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-09-21 22:17 -0500
          Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2018-09-14 18:30 +0200
            Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-14 20:46 +0200
      Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2018-09-14 19:57 +0200
        Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-14 20:56 +0200
          Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2018-09-15 18:32 +0200
            Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-16 15:06 +0200
      Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-09-14 19:59 -0400
        Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-09-15 16:25 +0200
  Re: arm-gcc: pointer to constant string Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2018-09-14 13:49 +0300

csiph-web