Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1016566
| From | zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#861182: RFS ete |
| Date | 2020-07-05 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ap9UC-5KM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <AoxFD-6FQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AoRO3-2G2-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <AoSh4-3bV-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tA90S-5mC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <AoSh4-3bV-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
I have merged the work into https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 Detail can also be checked from https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ete3 On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 11:19 PM Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 10:48:13PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > > > The package at > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 > > > > > > builds but is also not finished yet. I do not remember what had stopped > > > me from finalising and uploading. Please checkout and moreover if you > > > talk next time about "ete packaging repositor" provide a link. :-) > > > > Thanks for your information. I have not noticed the existing RFP and > > have issued an ITP > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963732. > > Should I close the ITP I issued ? I wonder how to turn the RFP into ITP. > > I do not really mind. May be merging both bugs is the technical correct > way to go. > > > I have created a personal repository at > > https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/ and the ci passes > > https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/-/pipelines/152628. > > The package has been uploaded to https://mentors.debian.net/package/ete. > > As I said I do not require sponsees to upload to mentors. The rationale > is that I sometimes want to change things quickly and directly - thus I > always sponsor from salsa repository. > > > I am intending to merge these works into > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3. > > Yes, please do so. > > > Some technical aspect of merging these two repos: > > I have found that med-team/python-ete3 repo uses some patches to deal > > with the offline testing problems. I think there is a more elegant way > > to handle this obstacle. > > As I tried to express: Feel free to take over your solution. There is > no point in sticking to not so good solutions just because they were > invented once. > > > To summarize the way: using pytest instead of unittest. > > For more detail, see > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/06/msg00035.html. > > So I am planning to override med-team/python-ete3 testing rule by > > using the one of zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/. > > Yep. Please go for it! :-) > > > For other parts, I think it is not difficult to merge. > > Sounds good. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#861182: RFS ete Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-03 19:30 +0200
Bug#861182: RFS ete zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com> - 2020-07-04 17:00 +0200
Bug#861182: RFS ete Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-04 17:30 +0200
Bug#861182: RFS ete zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com> - 2020-07-05 12:20 +0200
Bug#861182: RFS ete Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-05 12:40 +0200
Bug#861182: Bug#963732: RFS ete zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com> - 2020-07-05 14:00 +0200
Bug#963732: RFS ete Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-05 15:40 +0200
Bug#861182: Bug#963732: RFS ete zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com> - 2020-07-06 04:10 +0200
Bug#861182: Bug#963732: RFS ete Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2020-07-06 08:30 +0200
csiph-web