Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1016477

Bug#861182: RFS ete

From	zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject	Bug#861182: RFS ete
Date	2020-07-04 17:00 +0200
Message-ID	<AoRO3-2G2-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <AoxFD-6FQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <AoxFD-6FQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <AoxFD-6FQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tA90S-5mC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <AoxFD-6FQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

> The package at
>
>  https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3
>
> builds but is also not finished yet.  I do not remember what had stopped
> me from finalising and uploading.  Please checkout and moreover if you
> talk next time about "ete packaging repositor" provide a link. :-)

Thanks for your information. I have not noticed the existing RFP and
have issued an ITP
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963732.
Should I close the ITP I issued ? I wonder how to turn the RFP into ITP.

I have created a personal repository at
https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/ and the ci passes
https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/-/pipelines/152628.
The package has been uploaded to https://mentors.debian.net/package/ete.
I am intending to merge these works into
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3.

Some technical aspect of merging these two repos:
I have found that med-team/python-ete3 repo uses some patches to deal
with the offline testing problems. I think there is a more elegant way
to handle this obstacle.
To summarize the way: using pytest instead of unittest.
For more detail, see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/06/msg00035.html.
So I am planning to override med-team/python-ete3 testing rule by
using the one of zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/.
For other parts, I think it is not difficult to merge.

Yours
zhaofeng-shu33

On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:17 AM Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 05:10:32PM +0300, merkys@debian.org wrote:
> > On 2020-07-03 13:50, zhao feng wrote:
> > > Thanks for your help. I can build the package on buster and bullyseye.
> > > Which distribution do you use? I find the version of softwares like
> > > python is quite new.
> >
> > The package fails to build on clean sid chroot. Most likely some Python
> > dependencies are missing from debian/control.
>
> The package at
>
>    https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3
>
> builds but is also not finished yet.  I do not remember what had stopped
> me from finalising and uploading.  Please checkout and moreover if you
> talk next time about "ete packaging repositor" provide a link. :-)
>
> > By the way, packaging of 'ete3' seems to be ongoing in Debian Med team
> > as well (adding Andreas in CC):
> > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3. I suggest getting in
> > touch with them to keep duplicate efforts minimal.
>
> Definitely.  Thanks for spotting.
>
> Kind regards
>
>      Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de

Thread

Bug#861182: RFS ete Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-03 19:30 +0200
  Bug#861182: RFS ete zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com> - 2020-07-04 17:00 +0200
    Bug#861182: RFS ete Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-04 17:30 +0200
      Bug#861182: RFS ete zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com> - 2020-07-05 12:20 +0200
        Bug#861182: RFS ete Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-05 12:40 +0200
          Bug#861182: Bug#963732: RFS ete zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com> - 2020-07-05 14:00 +0200
            Bug#963732: RFS ete Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-05 15:40 +0200
              Bug#861182: Bug#963732: RFS ete zhao feng <zhaofengshu33@gmail.com> - 2020-07-06 04:10 +0200
                Bug#861182: Bug#963732: RFS ete Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2020-07-06 08:30 +0200

csiph-web