Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12683
| From | Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team |
| Date | 2020-06-28 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AmJrA-2fD-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <AmJrA-2fD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2020-06-28 16:48:02 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] > I don't want this to happen again. So I am hereby asking to take > over the maintenance of these packages which aren't in the > OpenStack team. They will be updated regularly, each 6 months, > with the rest of OpenStack, following the upstream > global-requirement pace. I'm confident it's going to work well for > me and the OpenStack team, but as well for the rest of Debian. > > Is anyone from the team opposing to this? If so, please explain > the drawbacks if the OpenStack team takes over. While I don't agree with Thomas's harsh tone in the bits of the message I snipped (please Thomas, I'm sure everyone's trying their best, there's no need to attack a fellow contributor personally over technical issues), I did want to point out that the proposal makes some sense. The Testing Cabal folk were heavily involved in OpenStack and influential in shaping its quality assurance efforts; so OpenStack relies much more heavily on these libraries than other ecosystems of similar size, and OpenStack community members, present and past, continue to collaborate upstream on their development. -- Jeremy Stanley
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2020-06-28 19:40 +0200
csiph-web