Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Jeremy Stanley Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Jun 28 17:31:35 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 X-Greylist: delayed 1727 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 17:31:22 UTC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ctslvuagg45zgij7" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:4802:7801:102:be76:4eff:fe20:63e0 X-Sa-Exim-Rcpt-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From: fungi@yuggoth.org X-Sa-Exim-Scanned: No (on azathoth.yuggoth.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18401 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20200628170229.ar5o24qnhvm62pfk@yuggoth.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 53 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 17:02:29 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20200628170229.ar5o24qnhvm62pfk@yuggoth.org> X-Original-References: <10f32e46-e9e5-acbe-739f-fe563da025e3@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12683 --ctslvuagg45zgij7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-06-28 16:48:02 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] > I don't want this to happen again. So I am hereby asking to take > over the maintenance of these packages which aren't in the > OpenStack team. They will be updated regularly, each 6 months, > with the rest of OpenStack, following the upstream > global-requirement pace. I'm confident it's going to work well for > me and the OpenStack team, but as well for the rest of Debian. >=20 > Is anyone from the team opposing to this? If so, please explain > the drawbacks if the OpenStack team takes over. While I don't agree with Thomas's harsh tone in the bits of the message I snipped (please Thomas, I'm sure everyone's trying their best, there's no need to attack a fellow contributor personally over technical issues), I did want to point out that the proposal makes some sense. The Testing Cabal folk were heavily involved in OpenStack and influential in shaping its quality assurance efforts; so OpenStack relies much more heavily on these libraries than other ecosystems of similar size, and OpenStack community members, present and past, continue to collaborate upstream on their development. --=20 Jeremy Stanley --ctslvuagg45zgij7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEl65Jb8At7J/DU7LnSPmWEUNJWCkFAl74zR5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDk3 QUU0OTZGQzAyREVDOUZDMzUzQjJFNzQ4Rjk5NjExNDM0OTU4MjkACgkQSPmWEUNJ WCkvUg//ePvUdyqcZB2+2Uf3EeYoiWsypkP6lHJdBicrR0HjDdeyjgkxF4sdtVn5 AYIrEw5U75Yzs9DkI0g03UfwM1MI8CapinkC8lm9y4Dqx3A+b5gpsaJPFbfgJpu0 IIYkYScPit1rxwjxuG3tPDeU8rFbmS4cnOGC9FlJYngrqq6wm/1/iXril2qdBhZl dNwv34HQUAZrQKHq9OpDb4K0kg+/QW7x/n0z82psZROoGBZpnJar6Zxrw3QUxWBc 9W2R21cR2wTr+KFVbf4+5lQq6o+4Js2va1CXND0dbc8ND0EMXVUs2C2MFVHqllpa dL8h4LTGzLLzXC7v8lVEGSmN2Dmpul4OtY5bD4LSchMpsqzCUzA4ru4L+3G355yt 87k4YlH6aYfPnYZytXQO4FI0B+1xLqODz4WeukkotYPrsAhDL6emugzkbIndUd1X sS6j3NCho9fr2+bgyUsr4xtCWn//mdpipRPDb+wbhfSOwxfBHW5kDx8FHq9RAL10 a5WmOe2KGfEjvUifLp8ocfSbivziKjxpx33PmPZizmqFjKVHAf70Q1P7cdNxKpVm HocPNnLtR3yDbM9AwD1YsMfxPcvufm7Y1OjxNW00AQzRdpi2PyGA4sWF95P3O/Yr fWkGQSxuqWCemHbcpSIWxwttAdGtA566icIN6PhJCVT44NlfgxA= =QAxo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ctslvuagg45zgij7--