Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #227559
| From | David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable |
| Date | 2020-10-03 03:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AVEGJ-2v8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <AVesV-1Um-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <AVnwe-80r-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <AVrgu-28d-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <AVBSx-Mv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AVDrj-1Qx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2020-10-02 17:16, Linux-Fan wrote: > David Christensen writes: >> The Fujitsu might do PCIe/NVMe 4X M.2 or U.2 SSD's with the right >> adapter card. > > Been there, failed at that: > https://www.reichelt.de/pcie-x8-karte-zu-2x-nvme-m-2-key-m-lp-delock-90305-p256917.html?&trstct=pos_3&nbc=1 > > > I added two SSDs, a Crucial P5 SSD 2TB, M.2 NVMe and a Seagate FireCuda > 510 SSD 2TB M.2 PCIe (all ordered together) and started the server. > Nothing was recognized at the OS level but opening up the 1U case showed > a fault indicator LED at the PCIe slot where I had added the new card. Perhaps a different brand adapter card would give better results. >> Rather than a new VM server and a new workstation, perhaps a new >> workstation with enough memory and fast local working storage would be >> adequate for both purposes. > > Maybe; I will get some prices for comparision... In terms of the base > model price I do not expect there to be much difference between the > server and the workstation with the same computation power, but if the > workstation allows custom HDDs while staying under warranty it might be > much cheaper. Buying a new major brand server/ workstation with all the parts installed at the factory is going to be expensive. As other readers have mentioned, a small business that builds to order should have better prices and may offer "quiet" systems. In addition to U.2 drives, Intel makes server systems: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/servers/server-chassis-systems.html And, Intel seems to be related to the Clear Linux distribution: https://clearlinux.org/ I would expect an Intel server with Intel drives and Clear Linux should be a good combination. Perhaps you should research Clear Linux and/or ask the community. David
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-01 23:40 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-10-02 00:50 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-02 01:30 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-10-02 12:40 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable ghe2001 <ghe2001@protonmail.com> - 2020-10-02 01:00 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-10-02 08:30 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-10-02 09:20 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-02 13:20 +0200
Re: Signing emails, was Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-10-02 17:30 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-10-03 00:40 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-03 02:20 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-10-03 03:40 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-10-02 15:50 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-10-02 16:50 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-02 21:20 +0200
csiph-web