Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #227537
| From | David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable |
| Date | 2020-10-02 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AVnwe-80r-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <AVesV-1Um-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2020-10-01 14:37, Linux-Fan wrote: > Hello fellow list users, > > I am constantly needing more computation power, RAM and HDD storage such > that I have finally decided to buy a server for my next "workstation". The > reasoning is that my experience with "real" servers is that they are most > reliable, very helpful in indicating errors (dedicated LEDs next to the > PCIe > slots for instance) and modern servers' noise seems to be acceptable for my > working envirnoment (?) > > I currently use a Fujitsu RX 1330 M1 (1U server, very silent) and it > clearly > is not "enough" in terms of RAM and HDD capacity. A little more graphics > processing power than a low-profile GPU would be nice, too :) > > Rack-Mountability is a must, although I am open to putting another tower in > there, sideways, should that be advantageous. > > In terms of "performance" specifications, I am thinking of the following: > > * 1x16-core CPU (e.g. AMD EPYC 7302) > > * 64 GiB RAM (e.g. 2x32 GiB or 4x16 GiB) > > I plan to extend this to 128 GiB as soon as the need arises. > As I am exceeding the 4T mark, I am increasingly considering the > use of ZFS. > > Currently, I have the maximum of 32 GiB installed in the > RX 1330 M1 and while it is often enough, there are times where I > am using 40 GiB SSD swap to overcome the limits. > > * 2x2T HDD for slow storage (local Debian Mirror, working data), > 2x4T SSD for fast storage (VMs, OS) > I will do software-RAID1 (ZFS or mdadm is still undecided). > I possible, I would like to use the power of the modern NVMe PCIe > U.2 (U.3?) SSDs, because they really seem to be much faster and that > may speed-up the parallel use of VMs and be more future-proof. > > * 1-2x 10G N-BaseT Ethernet for connecting to other machines to share > virtual machine storage (I am doing this already and it works...) > > * a 150W GPU if possible (75W full-sized card would be OK, too). > > Typical workloads: > data compression (Debian live build, xz), > virtual machines (software installation, updates) > > Rarely: > GPGPU (e.g. nVidia CUDA, but some experimentation with OpenCL, too) > single-core load coupled with very high RAM use (cbmc) > > Some time ago, there was this thread > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/06/msg01117.html > It already gave me some ideas... > > I am considering one the following models which are AMD EPYC based (I think > AMDs provide good performance for my types of use). > > * HPE DL385 G10 Plus > * Dell PowerEdge R7515 > > I have an old HP DL380 G4 in the rack and while it is incredibly loud, > it is > also very reliable. Of course, it is rarely online for its excessive > loudness and power draw, but I derive that HPE is going be reliable? Before > the Fujitsu, I used a HP Z400 workstation and before that a HP Compaq d530 > CMT and all of these still "function", despite being too slow for today's > loads. > > I am also taking into consideration these, although they are Intel-based > and > I find it a lot harder to obtain information on prices, compatibility etc. > for these manufacturers: > > * Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M5 > * Oracle X8-2L > (seems to be too loud for my taste. especially compared to the others?) > > I have already learned from my local vendor that HPE does not support the > use of non-HPE HDDs in the server which means I would need to buy all my > drives directly from HPE (of course this will be very expensive). > Additionally, none of the server manufacturers list Debian compatibility, > thus my questions are as follows: > > * Does anybody run Debian stable (10) on any of these servers? > Does it work well? > > * Is there any experience with "unsupported" HDD configurations i.e. > disks not bought from the server manufacturer? > > I would think that during the warranty period (3y) I best stay with > the manufacturer-provided HDDs but after that, it would be nice to be > able to add some more "cheap" storage... > > * Of course, if there are any other comments, I am happy to hear them, too. > > I am looking into all options although a fully self-built system is > probably too much. I once tried to (only) get a decent PC case and > failed > at it... I can only imagine it being worse for rackmount PC cases and > creating a complete system composed of individual parts? > > Thanks in advance > Linux-Fan I suggest identifying your workloads, how much CPU, memory, disk I/O, etc., each requires, and then dividing them across your several computers. Understand that a 4 core 5 GHz CPU and a 16 core 2.5 GHz CPU have similar prices and power consumption, but the former will run sequential tasks twice as fast and the latter will run concurrent tasks twice as fast. I would think that you should convert one of your existing machines into a file server. Splitting 4 TB across 2 @ 2 TB HDD's and 2 @ 4 TB SSD's can work, but 4 @ 4 TB SSD's with a 10 Gbps Ethernet connection should be impressive. If you choose ZFS, it will need memory. The rule of thumb is 5 GB of memory per 1 TB of storage. So, pick a machine that has at least 20 GB of memory. As for the workstation, it is difficult to find a vendor that supports Debian. But, there are vendors that support Ubuntu; which is based upon Debian. So, you can run Ubuntu and you might be able to run Debian: https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=ubuntu%20workstation David
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-01 23:40 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-10-02 00:50 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-02 01:30 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-10-02 12:40 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable ghe2001 <ghe2001@protonmail.com> - 2020-10-02 01:00 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-10-02 08:30 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-10-02 09:20 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-02 13:20 +0200
Re: Signing emails, was Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-10-02 17:30 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-10-03 00:40 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-03 02:20 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-10-03 03:40 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-10-02 15:50 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-10-02 16:50 +0200
Re: General-Purpose Server for Debian Stable Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-10-02 21:20 +0200
csiph-web