Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #227226

Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector??

From Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector??
Date 2020-09-22 00:20 +0200
Message-ID <ARCk9-1JX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <AR0Rz-4qn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AR2ql-5aO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AR334-5DQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <AR3cJ-5He-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ARl9E-80D-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/20/20 11:53 PM, David Christensen wrote:

> On 2020-09-20 01:40, Reco wrote:
>>     Hi.
>
> Hello.  :-)
>
>
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 01:32:47AM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
>>> On 2020-09-20 00:49, Long Wind wrote:
>>>>       On Sunday, September 20, 2020, 2:15:21 PM GMT+8, David 
>>>> Christensen
>>>> First, backup your data.
>>>> Please run the following command and post your complete console 
>>>> session
>>>> -- prompt, command, output.  Substitute DISKID as appropriate:
>>>>
>>>>       # smartctl -x /dev/disk/by-id/DISKID
>>>
>>> Thank you for posting the smartctl report.  I don't see any obvious 
>>> problems.
>>
>> I do. First, drive does not have any bad sectors,
>>
>> 197 Current_Pending_Sector  -O--C-   100   100   000    -    0
>> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable   ----C-   100   100   000    -    0
>
> Yes.
>
>
I'd also do a smartctl -A and look at the raw read errors. Depending on 
the disk manufacturer, that can be a good indicator that there's a 
failing sector, and the drive is doing lots of reads before it can 
actually access the data in a block or sector.


-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.  .... Yogi Berra

Theory is when you know everything but nothing works.
Practice is when everything works but no one knows why.
In our lab, theory and practice are combined:
nothing works and no one knows why.  ... unknown

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 04:40 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-09-20 05:20 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-09-20 06:00 +0200
    Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 07:00 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-20 08:20 +0200
    Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 10:00 +0200
      Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-20 10:40 +0200
        Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-20 10:50 +0200
          Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-21 06:00 +0200
            Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-21 07:30 +0200
            Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2020-09-22 00:20 +0200
        Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 11:40 +0200
          Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-20 14:30 +0200
        Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-22 06:20 +0200
          Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-22 06:50 +0200
            Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-22 08:50 +0200
              Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-22 12:20 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-22 15:10 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-23 00:50 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-22 23:00 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2020-09-23 09:20 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-20 10:00 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2020-09-20 18:30 +0200

csiph-web