Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #227158

Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector??

Show all headers | View raw

	Hi.

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 01:32:47AM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> On 2020-09-20 00:49, Long Wind wrote:
> >      On Sunday, September 20, 2020, 2:15:21 PM GMT+8, David Christensen
> > First, backup your data.
> > Please run the following command and post your complete console session
> > -- prompt, command, output.  Substitute DISKID as appropriate:
> > 
> >      # smartctl -x /dev/disk/by-id/DISKID
> 
> Thank you for posting the smartctl report.  I don't see any obvious problems.

I do. First, drive does not have any bad sectors,

197 Current_Pending_Sector  -O--C-   100   100   000    -    0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   ----C-   100   100   000    -    0


Second, 

SATA Phy Event Counters (GP Log 0x11)
ID      Size     Value  Description
0x000a  2            2  Device-to-host register FISes sent due to a COMRESET
0x0001  2            0  Command failed due to ICRC error 0

[1] helpfully states:

CRC error during data transfer
This is indicated by ICRC bit in the ERROR register and means that
corruption occurred during data transfer. Up to ATA/ATAPI-7, the
standard specifies that this bit is only applicable to UDMA transfers
but ATA/ATAPI-8 draft revision 1f says that the bit may be applicable to
multiword DMA and PIO.


So, it's either a damaged SATA cable, or a damaged SATA port on a
motherboard. But the drive in question is Seagate, and for *those*
there's only one proper solution - throw the thing out into the nearest
garbage bin, and buy a real drive (WD or Toshiba).


Reco

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/htmldocs/libata/ataExceptions.html

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 04:40 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-09-20 05:20 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-09-20 06:00 +0200
    Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 07:00 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-20 08:20 +0200
    Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 10:00 +0200
      Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-20 10:40 +0200
        Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-20 10:50 +0200
          Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-21 06:00 +0200
            Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-21 07:30 +0200
            Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2020-09-22 00:20 +0200
        Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 11:40 +0200
          Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-20 14:30 +0200
        Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-22 06:20 +0200
          Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-22 06:50 +0200
            Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-22 08:50 +0200
              Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-22 12:20 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-22 15:10 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-23 00:50 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-22 23:00 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2020-09-23 09:20 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-20 10:00 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2020-09-20 18:30 +0200

csiph-web