Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #227163

Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector??

Show all headers | View raw

Long Wind wrote:

> Thank David and Reco!data cable isn't marked with 3Gbps, but it works fine
> with other 300G disk it's easy to buy sata2 data cable, but does mainboard
> support sata2?can't sata2 disk work compatibly in old pc that supports
> sata1 only?it's too bad if it can't. i've left home and stay at other
> place and can't use problem disk for a long time.

The selected mode for data transfer is 1.5 - lowest possible, which might
mean that you have old controller or cable issue or some kind of
incompatibility. Old motherboard is also an option.
As Roco said - Seagate have bad reputation. Nowday manufacturers do not test
hardware with older boards/controllers - no one has the time to test
extnsively, so it might be that it works on some and gives problems on
other board.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 04:40 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-09-20 05:20 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-09-20 06:00 +0200
    Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 07:00 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-20 08:20 +0200
    Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 10:00 +0200
      Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-20 10:40 +0200
        Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-20 10:50 +0200
          Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-21 06:00 +0200
            Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-21 07:30 +0200
            Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2020-09-22 00:20 +0200
        Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-20 11:40 +0200
          Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-20 14:30 +0200
        Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-22 06:20 +0200
          Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-22 06:50 +0200
            Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-22 08:50 +0200
              Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-22 12:20 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-22 15:10 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-23 00:50 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-22 23:00 +0200
                Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2020-09-23 09:20 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-20 10:00 +0200
  Re: linux isn't robust enough to handle bad sector?? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2020-09-20 18:30 +0200

csiph-web