Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #226882
| From | David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... |
| Date | 2020-09-11 05:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ANHBM-6RJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <AN9Tr-2iA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ANjzs-81C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ANnWq-2oc-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ANxVM-TL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ANDot-4cm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 08:30, David Christensen
<dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> wrote:
> On 2020-09-10 09:44, David Wright wrote:
> > I don't like parted particularly, and don't know what "free" does.
> > Can you elucidate?
> > $ man parted | grep -i free
> > $ info --output=/dev/stdout --subnodes parted | grep -i free
> I also am unable to find canonical documentation via RTFM, info, and
> STFW. GNU must have missed documenting it (?).
# parted --help | grep -A 1 free
print [devices|free|list,all|NUMBER] display the partition table,
available devices, free space, all found partitions, or a particular
partition
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-09-08 19:00 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2020-09-08 19:00 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-09-08 19:00 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-08 22:40 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-09-08 23:50 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-09 00:50 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-09 17:10 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-10 03:30 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2020-09-10 08:10 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-10 18:50 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-11 00:40 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2020-09-11 05:10 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-11 06:20 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-11 16:30 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-11 01:20 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2020-09-11 05:50 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-11 16:30 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-09-11 22:10 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2020-09-09 17:20 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-09 18:30 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2020-09-09 19:10 +0200
Re: Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes ... Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2020-09-08 23:10 +0200
csiph-web