Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12599
| From | Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs |
| Date | 2020-05-16 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <A77ex-1QJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <A6L4l-4Gf-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <A6Ma6-5iA-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <A6TXX-1u9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <A7470-8q2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <A746Z-8q2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
❦ 16 mai 2020 08:09 -04, Paul Tagliamonte: >> > Would it be fair to say that your main objection is that Ubuntu has >> > much higher popularity than Debian >> >> This is what I regret, indeed. It's been like that for many years, and >> the trend isn't reversing. We should ask ourselves why. From my point of >> view, I see it as a problem of marketing more than OS content or >> technical excellence. > > No, I think they do things better. Their installer is much better, and it's > a *lot* easier to switch. They had signed UEFI images before us, > and they enable things like firmware for wifi cards. This allows > Ubuntu to be easier for non-technical users to install computers > without understanding main vs contrib vs nonfree, how to disable > SecureBoot or what a firmware package is. We have lessons > to learn about usability and we've not learned them, and remained > stubborn about it. Also for servers: - official cloud images far before us (kudos to Zigo for bootstrapping the effort on our side) - PPA - HWE kernels We still have some things better than Ubuntu: - backports - security support - not converting everything to Snaps -- There is a great discovery still to be made in Literature: that of paying literary men by the quantity they do NOT write.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs jojo <jojo@peek-a-boo.at> - 2020-05-15 18:10 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-05-15 19:20 +0200
Disparaging people's motivation to contribute to Debian was: Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-05-15 22:50 +0200
Re: Disparaging people's motivation to contribute to Debian Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2020-05-16 11:40 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2020-05-15 20:00 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2020-05-16 03:40 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2020-05-16 05:10 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2020-05-18 01:50 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-05-18 02:20 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2020-05-16 05:10 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> - 2020-05-16 14:30 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2020-05-16 17:50 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2020-05-18 09:20 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2020-05-18 09:30 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs jojo <jojo@peek-a-boo.at> - 2020-05-18 11:50 +0200
Re: packaging DiscoDOS - a cli tool for vinyl DJs Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2020-05-18 11:50 +0200
csiph-web