Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #222464

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

From Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?
Date 2020-05-13 20:20 +0200
Message-ID <A6494-2kd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <A5Lzr-6Tc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <A5YQ1-6G3-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 13 May 2020 12:33:32 +0000
Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> wrote:

> nemommxiv@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >I can't find anything definitive on this question.  Some say, 100MB is
> >fine; others 215 or 550 is a safe choice.  It all seems to be just
> >opinions.
> >
> >Anyone know for sure? I hate having to waste hundreds of megs for a
> >partition that only needs to hold a few megs, if that much.
> >
> >This applies to one of those small, $300+/- notebooks (haven't decided
> >which one, yet) that usually use 32 or 64GB eMMCs.  I'm trying to
> >maximize the available free space. Best option seems to be a MBR
> >install, one OS only (Buster, X, window manager only, etc.), / and
> >swap.  But if that's not possible . . . .  Hence, my query.  
> 
> In Debian we've followed recommendations to use 500M as a default
> size. That may often be larger than people need, but it's safe in case
> people are dual-booting and/or doing firmware updates later. It's
> likely to be difficult to resize after the fact.

The reason I've read for the ~500MB size is to assure FAT32 when
formatting the partition as using less can cause problems with Linux
efi installs.

> You can choose a smaller size *at your own risk*, but d-i will
> complain a lot if you try to go very small, below ~32MiB.

Isn't everything one does "at your own risk?" :) Some social fanatics
believe otherwise, but they'd be wrong.

B

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 00:30 +0200
  Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Andrea Borgia <andrea@borgia.bo.it> - 2020-05-13 00:40 +0200
    Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? "Rick Thomas" <rick.thomas@pobox.com> - 2020-05-13 02:40 +0200
      Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-05-13 07:40 +0200
        Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:40 +0200
          Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-05-13 21:10 +0200
          Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-05-13 21:20 +0200
      Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Andrea Borgia <andrea@borgia.bo.it> - 2020-05-13 09:20 +0200
        Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:40 +0200
      Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:40 +0200
    Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-05-13 13:50 +0200
      Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2020-05-14 18:30 +0200
        Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Marco Möller <talby@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> - 2020-05-14 21:00 +0200
    Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:30 +0200
      Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-05-14 04:20 +0200
  Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2020-05-13 14:40 +0200
    Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:20 +0200

csiph-web