Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #222464
| From | Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? |
| Date | 2020-05-13 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <A6494-2kd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <A5Lzr-6Tc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <A5YQ1-6G3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 13 May 2020 12:33:32 +0000 Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> wrote: > nemommxiv@gmail.com wrote: > > > >I can't find anything definitive on this question. Some say, 100MB is > >fine; others 215 or 550 is a safe choice. It all seems to be just > >opinions. > > > >Anyone know for sure? I hate having to waste hundreds of megs for a > >partition that only needs to hold a few megs, if that much. > > > >This applies to one of those small, $300+/- notebooks (haven't decided > >which one, yet) that usually use 32 or 64GB eMMCs. I'm trying to > >maximize the available free space. Best option seems to be a MBR > >install, one OS only (Buster, X, window manager only, etc.), / and > >swap. But if that's not possible . . . . Hence, my query. > > In Debian we've followed recommendations to use 500M as a default > size. That may often be larger than people need, but it's safe in case > people are dual-booting and/or doing firmware updates later. It's > likely to be difficult to resize after the fact. The reason I've read for the ~500MB size is to assure FAT32 when formatting the partition as using less can cause problems with Linux efi installs. > You can choose a smaller size *at your own risk*, but d-i will > complain a lot if you try to go very small, below ~32MiB. Isn't everything one does "at your own risk?" :) Some social fanatics believe otherwise, but they'd be wrong. B
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 00:30 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Andrea Borgia <andrea@borgia.bo.it> - 2020-05-13 00:40 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? "Rick Thomas" <rick.thomas@pobox.com> - 2020-05-13 02:40 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-05-13 07:40 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:40 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2020-05-13 21:10 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-05-13 21:20 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Andrea Borgia <andrea@borgia.bo.it> - 2020-05-13 09:20 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:40 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:40 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-05-13 13:50 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2020-05-14 18:30 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Marco Möller <talby@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> - 2020-05-14 21:00 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:30 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-05-14 04:20 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2020-05-13 14:40 +0200
Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-05-13 20:20 +0200
csiph-web