Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5827
| From | Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security, linux.debian.user.italian |
| Subject | Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code |
| Date | 2020-05-03 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <A2nWG-7xB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <A1Jmy-7Xm-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <A1JFT-84L-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <A1KiC-58-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <A1Vxo-7og-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sat, 2 May 2020 10:14:13 +0200 Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/05/20 22:00, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > On 01/05/2020 20:31, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > >> https isn“t any more secure than http as long as you do not have a > >> verifiably trustworthy server certificate that you can check for. As > >> we know the certification authority system is totally broken. > > > > Imperfect yes, but still better than nothing. > > There is another problem: implementation. Not all the software that > implement HTTPS verify the validity of the certificate and the validity > of all the certification chain. I am not a security expert, but see my argument here with the Debian ssmtp maintainer over whether a package that advertises TLS functionality but fails to check the received certificate (and does not mention this anywhere in its documentation) should be considered to have an 'important' bug ;) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662960#51 Celejar
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2020-05-01 21:20 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@elstel.org> - 2020-05-01 21:40 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2020-05-01 22:20 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2020-05-02 03:00 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code estellnb@elstel.org - 2020-05-02 18:10 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> - 2020-05-02 10:20 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2020-05-02 11:10 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code estellnb@elstel.org - 2020-05-02 18:30 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code Jason Fergus <leech@thefnords.org> - 2020-05-02 19:00 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code estellnb@elstel.org - 2020-05-02 19:30 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-05-03 16:40 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code estellnb@elstel.org - 2020-05-02 18:20 +0200
Re: Scripts that run insecurely-downloaded code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2020-05-02 03:20 +0200
csiph-web