Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage > #2526
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage |
| Subject | Re: HDD capacity stagnation |
| Date | 2012-02-01 14:35 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <9orq7gF8gvU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jg6tq4$ijn$1@dont-email.me> <qv6hi71htoeom9hspael8i2ca83021ujif@4ax.com> |
DevilsPGD wrote > Tom Del Rosso <td_03@verizon.net.invalid> wrote >> Capacity seems to be progressing very slowly. We were stuck at 2TB >> for the longest time (a lot longer than we were stuck at 528MB) but >> when the gates opened we got 3TB, and not 8TB. Is there another >> obstacle? > Right now we're at some physics limits with regards to densities. We > were close to this point before, but perpendicular magnetic recording > suddenly becoming stable/reliable helped get through the last time. > That's not to say there won't be any capacity increases in the future, > but at this point we're waiting on a breakthrough rather than an > incremental increase. Until there is a breakthrough, performance or > reliability suffer greatly along with significant cost increases if > you try to ramp up density. Expect maybe 10% density increases, likely > mostly being lost to additional redundancy in the drive (in other words, > I'd expect to see more reliable drives before higher capacity drives) > More importantly, in the consumer space, few > people really need more than 2TB/3TB drives. Thats just plain wrong, most obviously with PVRs. > In the high density storage business world, smaller, > more power efficient drives are all the rage. Not with the operations that need massive amounts of storage like google. > Combining the current density limits with the fact that most of > the major hard drive manufacturers are rebuilding after floods > will probably leave us around the current range for a while. They didnt all build in Thailand. > Once the manufacturers get rebuilt, expect to see better and faster drives > at current densities (why build a factory to sell 500GB drives when it's > the same factory costs for 2TB drives and 2TB drives see for more?) > Given that we're up to 1TB per platter, 4TB drives should be > possible in typical form-factors, but my guess is that 3TB drives > didn't sell well enough to be worth investing in 4TB designs just yet. And how well they sell obviously depends on the price charged for them.
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
HDD capacity stagnation "Tom Del Rosso" <td_03@verizon.net.invalid> - 2012-01-30 15:12 -0500
Re: HDD capacity stagnation "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-31 08:29 +1100
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-30 22:54 +0000
Re: HDD capacity stagnation "Tom Del Rosso" <td_03@verizon.net.invalid> - 2012-01-31 18:31 -0500
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-01 05:37 +0000
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> - 2012-02-01 07:32 +1100
Re: HDD capacity stagnation "Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody@NotMyISP.net> - 2012-01-31 18:55 -0500
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Joe Kotroczo <kotroczo@mac.com> - 2012-02-01 11:27 +0100
Re: HDD capacity stagnation DevilsPGD <Still-Just-A-Rat-In-A-Cage@crazyhat.net> - 2012-01-31 18:05 -0800
Re: HDD capacity stagnation "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-01 14:35 +1100
Re: HDD capacity stagnation DevilsPGD <Still-Just-A-Rat-In-A-Cage@crazyhat.net> - 2012-01-31 21:32 -0800
Re: HDD capacity stagnation "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-01 16:58 +1100
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2012-02-01 11:30 -0600
Re: HDD capacity stagnation DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2012-02-01 20:15 -0800
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-02 05:44 +0000
Re: HDD capacity stagnation David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-02-02 08:51 +0100
Re: HDD capacity stagnation "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 13:20 +1100
Re: HDD capacity stagnation rb <rb.57942z@no.email.invalid> - 2012-01-31 11:56 -0600
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2012-02-02 16:47 -0600
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Man-wai Chang <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 22:23 +0800
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-06 19:10 +0000
Re: HDD capacity stagnation "Tom Del Rosso" <td_03@verizon.net.invalid> - 2012-02-06 14:32 -0500
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-07 08:36 +0000
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2012-02-07 11:48 -0600
Re: HDD capacity stagnation "Tom Del Rosso" <td_03@verizon.net.invalid> - 2012-02-07 13:17 -0500
Re: HDD capacity stagnation "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-08 07:04 +1100
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-07 22:30 +0000
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-02-08 11:19 +0100
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-09 08:13 +0000
Re: HDD capacity stagnation DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2012-02-09 16:04 -0800
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-10 17:48 +0000
Re: HDD capacity stagnation DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2012-02-10 11:14 -0800
Re: HDD capacity stagnation Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> - 2012-02-12 06:23 +1100
csiph-web