Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Toughest Game Show Question |
| Date | 2012-01-11 14:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9n5hcpF60bU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> (permalink) |
| References | <e8760468-1ea4-4f12-83f6-f0fa7a460379@g41g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <78ecc52b-cc20-477c-9a83-dadd3b46d1ff@u20g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <20120110171743.392@kylheku.com> |
Am 11.01.2012 02:44, schrieb Kaz Kylheku: > On 2012-01-10, Bill Reid <hormelfree@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jan 9, 8:56 pm, divya bisht <bisht88.di...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> You are on a game show and there are three doors. The presenter tells >>> you that behind one of doors there is a car and behind the other two >>> are goats, if you pick the car you win it. After you have picked a >>> door the presenter opens a different door with a goat behind it, he >>> then gives you the chance to change what door you open, what should >>> you do? >>> >> OH NO, THE DREADED "MONTY HALL" PROBLEM, IT'S BEEN AT LEAST A >> DECADE SINCE I'VE SEEN THIS MONSTROUSITY REAR IT'S UGLY HEAD IN >> USENET!!!!!!! >> >> The answer is that it doesn't matter, your odds are still one >> in three no matter what you do...but wait, does it matter if the >> presenter knows what's behind the doors and shows you the goat >> to make the game more interesting? Let's see what happens with >> the "regs" here, might be fun... > > I think you an easily solve this by a simple division into cases, > and simple probabilities. > > Look Ma, no conditional probability, no Bayes' theorem. > > > Suppose Monty always reveals the goat. (This builds suspense in the > audience and is good for the show's ratings, which are more important > than whether or not cars are given away.) > > > There are two cases: > > Case 1: (p = 2/3) You picked the goat. > > Monty knows that this case is occurring, and reveals to you the other goat! So > you must switch to get the car, and by switching the car is guaranteed. > > Case 2: (p = 1/3) You picked the car. > > In this case, you must not switch; you're already on the car. > Of course Monty reveals a goat in this case also. > > > Now you don't know which of these cases you are in. But you do know > that one of these cases requires switching and the other requires > staying and that the one that requires switching occurs with p = 2/3, and the > one that requires staying occurs with p = 1/3. > > This essentially translates to "the probability that you must switch in order > to win the car is 2/3", and that translates to "the probability that > the car is behind the door you did not pick in round 1 is 2/3". > > If you do not switch, you are betting on being in Case 2, which is p = 1/3: the > same odds as a one-round draw. > > If you switch, you are betting that you are in Case 1, where you have p = 2/3 > odds, an improvement. > > > > Switching: no brainer. My simulation shows that by switching your total chance to win the car is 1/2 or probability 0.5 I think this is true, due to the fact that by switching you might go off the car choice. /Str
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Bill Reid <hormelfree@gmail.com> - 2012-01-10 06:47 -0800
Re: Toughest Game Show Question tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2012-01-10 07:11 -0800
Re: Toughest Game Show Question falk@rahul.net (Edward A. Falk) - 2012-01-11 00:05 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-01-10 11:23 -0500
Re: Toughest Game Show Question John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-01-10 16:48 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2012-01-10 19:15 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-10 13:27 -0800
Re: Toughest Game Show Question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-10 16:57 -0500
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2012-01-10 22:39 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-10 11:21 -0600
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Bill Reid <hormelfree@gmail.com> - 2012-01-10 15:43 -0800
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-10 22:53 -0600
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2012-01-11 05:00 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-11 06:32 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-11 07:22 -0500
Re: Toughest Game Show Question falk@rahul.net (Edward A. Falk) - 2012-01-12 22:51 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-13 12:14 +1300
Re: Toughest Game Show Question ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-01-12 15:17 -0800
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-01-10 14:33 -0500
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-11 01:44 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Dann Corbit <dcorbit@connx.com> - 2012-01-10 23:48 -0800
Re: Toughest Game Show Question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-11 07:23 -0500
Re: Toughest Game Show Question "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-11 14:33 +0100
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-01-11 13:48 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-11 18:44 +0100
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-01-11 18:10 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-11 19:23 +0100
Re: Toughest Game Show Question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-12 18:23 -0500
Re: Toughest Game Show Question "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-15 19:03 +0100
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-01-15 19:42 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-15 16:57 -0500
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-16 04:16 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-01-16 12:14 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Bill Reid <hormelfree@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 07:31 -0800
Re: Toughest Game Show Question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-26 09:33 -0800
Re: Toughest Game Show Question "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-01-12 21:07 +0000
factor jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-01-12 22:53 +0000
Re: Toughest Game Show Question pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-14 23:38 -0500
csiph-web