Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7

From	Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7
Date	2011-10-03 08:56 +1300
Message-ID	<9ertvrF5kfU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<fcba210d-ee60-491a-8576-633ac475d495@k34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <6be0c2d6-1460-486d-b253-f4128609144d@k15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <ln4nzrxnjz.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/ 3/11 07:20 AM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>
> 3. Use C99.  This will restrict your code to C99-conforming
> compilers.  As time passes, the set of compilers you can use
> *should* increase, but uptake has been disappointingly slow.
> Keep an eye on the development of the C201X standard; with luck,
> it *might* get better support in the coming years than C99 did.
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf>  is the
> latest draft.  C201X proposes to make some features optional --
> including some that are mandatory in C99.

In practice the set of targets without a standard C compiler is limited 
to those small embedded targets which lack either a gcc port, or a 
modern compiler.

When designing an embedded system, just avoid them unless the price 
point is really critical.

-- 
Ian Collins

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Compiler thats works in Windows 7 AK <anoopkammaran@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 01:44 -0700
  Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-30 10:54 +0200
    Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-02 03:01 -0700
      Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-02 12:21 +0200
        Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-02 05:42 -0700
        Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-02 11:43 -0500
          Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-02 20:11 +0200
            Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-03 00:42 -0500
              Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-03 08:49 +0200
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-10-03 12:31 -0700
            Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-03 00:23 -0700
              Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-03 10:33 +0200
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 AK <anoopkammaran@gmail.com> - 2011-10-03 09:29 -0700
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-03 18:42 +0200
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 tea strainer <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-10-05 19:22 +0000
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-05 22:08 +0200
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 "James" <no@spam.invalid> - 2011-10-05 13:17 -0700
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-05 22:31 +0200
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 AK <anoopkammaran@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 19:47 -0700
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-05 22:57 -0500
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 "James" <no@spam.invalid> - 2011-10-06 00:06 -0700
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Kleuskes & Moos <kleuske@somewhere.else.net> - 2011-10-06 19:37 +0000
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-10-05 16:22 -0700
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 gordonb.d74xa@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-10-05 21:16 -0500
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 AK <anoopkammaran@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 19:50 -0700
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 "James" <no@spam.invalid> - 2011-10-05 21:05 -0700
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-10-06 10:49 +0200
                Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-06 16:21 +0200
      Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-10-02 12:46 -0700
        Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-03 00:26 -0700
  Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-09-30 11:06 +0200
    Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-30 13:03 +0200
  Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Karthik Bharadwaj <nomail@fightspam.org> - 2011-09-30 07:41 -0600
    Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-30 19:11 +0200
  Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 08:03 -0700
    Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2011-09-30 16:18 +0000
      Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2011-09-30 14:37 -0400
  Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-02 03:04 -0700
    Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-10-02 11:20 -0700
      Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-03 08:56 +1300

csiph-web