Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.panservice.it!feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 |
| Date | Mon, 03 Oct 2011 08:56:43 +1300 |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <9ertvrF5kfU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <fcba210d-ee60-491a-8576-633ac475d495@k34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <6be0c2d6-1460-486d-b253-f4128609144d@k15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <ln4nzrxnjz.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net HCAkwZ6Wyyz65geK/KpFJAKYnzMpBK7mTmR28KBVc5j8Da0yZy |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:ek1qtR+D6+RabpPoIVSfqr3xjU8= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101021 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
| In-Reply-To | <ln4nzrxnjz.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c:11178 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 10/ 3/11 07:20 AM, Keith Thompson wrote: > > 3. Use C99. This will restrict your code to C99-conforming > compilers. As time passes, the set of compilers you can use > *should* increase, but uptake has been disappointingly slow. > Keep an eye on the development of the C201X standard; with luck, > it *might* get better support in the coming years than C99 did. > <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf> is the > latest draft. C201X proposes to make some features optional -- > including some that are mandatory in C99. In practice the set of targets without a standard C compiler is limited to those small embedded targets which lack either a gcc port, or a modern compiler. When designing an embedded system, just avoid them unless the price point is really critical. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compiler thats works in Windows 7 AK <anoopkammaran@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 01:44 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-30 10:54 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-02 03:01 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-02 12:21 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-02 05:42 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-02 11:43 -0500
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-02 20:11 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-03 00:42 -0500
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-03 08:49 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-10-03 12:31 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-03 00:23 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-03 10:33 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 AK <anoopkammaran@gmail.com> - 2011-10-03 09:29 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-03 18:42 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 tea strainer <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-10-05 19:22 +0000
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-05 22:08 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 "James" <no@spam.invalid> - 2011-10-05 13:17 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-05 22:31 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 AK <anoopkammaran@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 19:47 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-05 22:57 -0500
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 "James" <no@spam.invalid> - 2011-10-06 00:06 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Kleuskes & Moos <kleuske@somewhere.else.net> - 2011-10-06 19:37 +0000
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-10-05 16:22 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 gordonb.d74xa@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-10-05 21:16 -0500
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 AK <anoopkammaran@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 19:50 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 "James" <no@spam.invalid> - 2011-10-05 21:05 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-10-06 10:49 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-10-06 16:21 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-10-02 12:46 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-03 00:26 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-09-30 11:06 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-30 13:03 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Karthik Bharadwaj <nomail@fightspam.org> - 2011-09-30 07:41 -0600
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-30 19:11 +0200
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 08:03 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2011-09-30 16:18 +0000
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2011-09-30 14:37 -0400
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-02 03:04 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-10-02 11:20 -0700
Re: Compiler thats works in Windows 7 Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-03 08:56 +1300
csiph-web