Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #10309
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Thoughts on function |
| Date | 2011-09-20 13:15 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <9dq7pvF76kU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <d5a55708-e02d-4409-8ee1-7c23573e0a51@c22g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <9dnvkbFr5dU13@mid.individual.net> <0deff799-9602-458f-95fd-6e64d613e37c@w28g2000yqw.googlegroups.com> <9dpkdqFr5dU17@mid.individual.net> <dbbaeec5-c1c1-441b-8a5e-9d45a4eb2ae6@f17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
On 09/20/11 01:03 PM, Ebenezer wrote: > On Sep 19, 2:44 pm, Ian Collins<ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Well you've already made partialFlush static, so it's a obvious >> contender for a a member variable. The other two could be parameters. >> > > bool > SendBuffer::ending (uint32_t all, uint32_t numWritten) What is your objection to size_t? <snip> > The .o file is 48 bytes bigger in this form when using > g++ 4.5.1 and -O3. I'm not sure this is a step in the > right direction. Are you programming for a PIC? Otherwise why worry about 48 bytes? -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-14 22:01 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-15 17:08 +1200
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-15 07:34 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-16 07:38 +1200
Re: Thoughts on function Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-09-15 20:40 +0100
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-15 17:23 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 13:30 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-19 09:34 +1200
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 18:25 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-09-18 19:08 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 19:46 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-09-18 20:12 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 21:28 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-09-19 13:26 +0900
Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-19 16:45 +1200
Re: Thoughts on function Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-09-19 15:19 +0900
Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-19 16:43 +1200
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-19 11:16 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-20 07:44 +1200
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-19 18:03 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-20 13:15 +1200
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-19 18:27 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Fulvio Esposito <esposito.fulvio@gmail.com> - 2011-09-16 02:19 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-16 11:20 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function Fulvio Esposito <esposito.fulvio@gmail.com> - 2011-09-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Thoughts on function hanukas <jukka@liimatta.org> - 2011-09-19 06:19 -0700
csiph-web