Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #10309

Re: Thoughts on function

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Thoughts on function
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:15:43 +1200
Lines 22
Message-ID <9dq7pvF76kU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <19d88541-0f1e-4fa5-90dd-9ff8c23046f3@19g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <9ddfi0F784U12@mid.individual.net> <85a545df-d6b9-4e67-9570-4d2aab13b8c3@f41g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <9df2i4F2gmU11@mid.individual.net> <0d205a4f-b6d5-494e-baf1-b5add2798806@o9g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <880af656-7aaf-4e4c-baa8-91ae77d541e4@f41g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <9dn6ekFr5dU8@mid.individual.net> <d5a55708-e02d-4409-8ee1-7c23573e0a51@c22g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <9dnvkbFr5dU13@mid.individual.net> <0deff799-9602-458f-95fd-6e64d613e37c@w28g2000yqw.googlegroups.com> <9dpkdqFr5dU17@mid.individual.net> <dbbaeec5-c1c1-441b-8a5e-9d45a4eb2ae6@f17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net r1QxhW9Ky5tcxwUDiuj23g5F8qDaQbWkAXxar9iHyzyXs6ZY2x
Cancel-Lock sha1:n69cj6mri941B8tB+MwI3GzQFYg=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101021 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
In-Reply-To <dbbaeec5-c1c1-441b-8a5e-9d45a4eb2ae6@f17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:10309

Show key headers only | View raw

On 09/20/11 01:03 PM, Ebenezer wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2:44 pm, Ian Collins<ian-n...@hotmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>> Well you've already made partialFlush static, so it's a obvious
>> contender for a a member variable.  The other two could be parameters.
>>
>
> bool
> SendBuffer::ending (uint32_t all, uint32_t numWritten)

What is your objection to size_t?

<snip>

> The .o file is 48 bytes bigger in this form when using
> g++ 4.5.1 and -O3.  I'm not sure this is a step in the
> right direction.

Are you programming for a PIC?  Otherwise why worry about 48 bytes?

-- 
Ian Collins

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-14 22:01 -0700
  Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-15 17:08 +1200
    Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-15 07:34 -0700
      Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-16 07:38 +1200
        Re: Thoughts on function Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-09-15 20:40 +0100
        Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-15 17:23 -0700
          Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 13:30 -0700
            Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-19 09:34 +1200
              Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 18:25 -0700
                Re: Thoughts on function Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-09-18 19:08 -0700
                Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 19:46 -0700
                Re: Thoughts on function Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-09-18 20:12 -0700
                Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 21:28 -0700
                Re: Thoughts on function Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-09-19 13:26 +0900
                Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-19 16:45 +1200
                Re: Thoughts on function Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-09-19 15:19 +0900
                Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-19 16:43 +1200
                Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-19 11:16 -0700
                Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-20 07:44 +1200
                Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-19 18:03 -0700
                Re: Thoughts on function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-20 13:15 +1200
                Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-19 18:27 -0700
  Re: Thoughts on function Fulvio Esposito <esposito.fulvio@gmail.com> - 2011-09-16 02:19 -0700
    Re: Thoughts on function Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-09-16 11:20 -0700
      Re: Thoughts on function Fulvio Esposito <esposito.fulvio@gmail.com> - 2011-09-16 13:51 -0700
  Re: Thoughts on function hanukas <jukka@liimatta.org> - 2011-09-19 06:19 -0700

csiph-web