Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #47478

Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong...

From Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
References (1 earlier) <703e932670347ffc3c252c43cbb4e6a7@dizum.com> <nb7ht0$1oho$1@gioia.aioe.org> <42a0e4299dbdc118f403e7951eaa4908@dizum.com> <1mjk330.acvc3y9yzakN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <op.ydrsuvlxj514cl@benson.localhost>
Subject Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong...
Message-ID <94ffdea22180cc64c02d8d0cbbc4f003@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-03-04 04:16 +0100
Newsgroups alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Organization dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as liquid, in <news:op.ydrsuvlxj514cl@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> 
> we should probably formosa fakey.
> 
> -- 
> "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
> blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
> http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
> 
> -
> 
> FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
> <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
> 
> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
> 
> Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
> *moron*?
> 
> "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
> 
> it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
> real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
> 
> http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
> http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
> "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
> voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
> other:"
> http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
> 
> http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
> 
> on page 2:
> 
> ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
>   opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
>   of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
> 
> *COUGH*
> SPNAK!!
> 
> -
> 
> i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
> art if you ask nicely.
> see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
> 
> -
> 
> snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
> 
> - begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
> /*
> HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
> 
> http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
> 
> place those files in a directory and save this file as  
> snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
> 
> compiles with:
> 
> gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
> 
> run with:
> 
> ./a.out
> 
> enjoy the LULZ ;)
> 
> */
> #include <fprecision.h>
> #include <iostream.h>
> 
> using namespace std;
> 
> int main(){
> 
>    //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
>    //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
> 
>    float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
>    float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
>    float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
> ridiculous sinewave mess
>    float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
> snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
>    float_precision PI;
>    PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
> 
>    // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
>    while(sum < snickerPrediction){
> 
>      // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
> <db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
>      sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
> +  
> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
> 
>      // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
> snickerTurds
>      if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
>        cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
>      }
>      t = t+STEP;
>    }
> /*
> 
> Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
> "Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
> reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
> constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
> volts?"
> 
> Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
> never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
> That's how stupid you are.
> 
> Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
> "I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
> 
> Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
> notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
> summed.
> 
> the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
> figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
> still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
> k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
> 
> */
>    cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
> t <<endl;
> }
> - end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
> 
> -
> 
> Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
> "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
> rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
> <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
> 
> -
> 
> Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
> Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> <snicker>
> 
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
> 
> on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
> is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
> can go straight to hell*
> 
> *hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.
> 
> -
> 
> http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
> 
> http://cafepress.com/kooktown
> 
> http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
> 
> -
> 
> If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
> containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
> yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
> to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
> information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)
> 
> if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
> downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
> http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
> 
> -
> 
> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
> The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
> it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
> or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
> presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
> Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
> before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
> many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
> opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
> 
> -
> 
> Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:
> 
> $ perl fakeyBot.pl
> FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
> look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
> bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
> You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
> FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
> boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
> Robert. <snicker>
> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
> FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
> Robert> gay sex, mostly...
> FakeyBot>       Fag!
> 
> (just as useful as the original!)
> 
> -
> 
> snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
> friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
> <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
> "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
> largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
> the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
> using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
> figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
> while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
> process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
> service. It's not rocket science.
> 
> _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
> I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
> get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
> distinct impression was that the "anonymity
> research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
> trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
> kiddie pr0n network.)
> 
> That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
> Onymous was just icing on the cake."
> 
> -
> 
> Golden Killfile, June 2005
> KOTM, November 2006
> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
> Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
> Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
> Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
> Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
> AUK Mascot, September 2007
>

Somebody's melting down. Somebody's melting down. Haha haha ha ha.

It's Robert Michael Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA, the dildoriding
mathematical moron. LOL!

And Paul G. Derbyshire from Pembroke, Ontario, Canada appears to be
melting down a good bit, too.

Likely because your Usenet Lord and Master has drop-kicked both of you
retards across Usenet. Again.

<snicker>

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:37 +0100
  Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 15:19 -0500
    Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 15:33 -0500
      Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:04 +0100
    Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:58 +0100
      Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 16:27 -0500
        Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 04:22 +0100
          Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:37 -0500
            Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 05:18 +0100
            Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 21:29 -0800
            Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-04 16:47 -0500
      Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-03 22:21 +0000
        Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 17:24 -0500
        Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 17:31 -0500
          Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-03 22:39 +0000
            Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 17:40 -0500
              Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 16:39 -0800
                Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:21 -0500
                Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 21:26 -0800
          Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 17:42 -0500
            Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 17:43 -0500
              Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 16:42 -0800
            Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-03 22:46 +0000
              Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 17:47 -0500
            Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 16:41 -0800
          Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 04:16 +0100
            Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:31 -0500
              Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 05:44 +0100
            Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:32 -0500
              Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 21:27 -0800
      Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-03 18:10 -0500

csiph-web