Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #47394
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... |
| Date | 2016-03-02 15:19 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nb7ht0$1oho$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <op.ydorotgetm21m2@benson.localhost> <703e932670347ffc3c252c43cbb4e6a7@dizum.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 02/03/2016 12:37 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > On top of that, I used the sum total of the six sinewaves' maximum > amplitude as a quick acid test Backpedal denied. You said, and I quote: Message-ID: <2c6c675d028afa4dc5d63e241045ed0b@dizum.com> "At some point in a properly graphed resultant sinewave summation of the following sinewaves: A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude all of the sinewaves would constructively interfere to reach the maximum total summed amplitude of those individual sinewaves. 150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25" SPNAK! You have only one valid move to escape the trap you now find yourself in. If you say you were "just trolling" when you wrote that, your knight escapes without being captured, but it no longer supports that pawn on D4 and your whole position becomes seriously weakened, particularly in the "credibility" department ... *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:37 +0100
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 15:19 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 15:33 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:04 +0100
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:58 +0100
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 16:27 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 04:22 +0100
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:37 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 05:18 +0100
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 21:29 -0800
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-04 16:47 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-03 22:21 +0000
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 17:24 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 17:31 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-03 22:39 +0000
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 17:40 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 16:39 -0800
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:21 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 21:26 -0800
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 17:42 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 17:43 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 16:42 -0800
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-03 22:46 +0000
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 17:47 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 16:41 -0800
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 04:16 +0100
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:31 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 05:44 +0100
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:32 -0500
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-03 21:27 -0800
Re: Now anybody can prove fakey wrong... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-03 18:10 -0500
csiph-web