Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: size_t in a struct |
| Date | 2011-05-21 09:51 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <93o62vF1bbU12@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ir6bhi$fcu$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ir6d98$e50$1@dont-email.me> <ir6mjl$d08$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On 05/21/11 09:31 AM, Edward Rutherford wrote:
> Shao Miller wrote:
>> On 5/20/2011 14:22, Edward Rutherford wrote:
>>>
>> And the sizes of those types can vary per implementation, too, if I
>> recall correctly.
>>
>>> So if I have the following:
>>>
>>> typedef struct __buffer_t {
>>>
>>> char *buffer;
>>> size_t size;
>>>
>>> } Buffer_t;
>>>
>>> I should have mimized padding since size_t is an unsigned long.
>>
>> It is? How did you determine that?
>>
>>> However, will size_t ever become an unsigned long long?
>>
>> It might, as far as I know.
>
> So standard-wise, how do I handle size_t in structures to minmize
> padding? Should size_t all ways follow after pointers in structures?
> And if I have integers in the structure, where should I put size_t?
The standard does not go into the specifics of padding.
It is a reasonably safe bet to assume sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(void*).
I would point size_t members after pointer members.
> <OT>
> According my style(9) man page, the suggestion is to:
>
> "When declaring variables in structures, declare them sorted by use,
> then
> by size (largest to smallest), then by alphabetical order. "
>
> This would lead to padding, right? But I would have to assume a size
> for size_t to follow that style.
> </OT>
It would, but in most uses, padding isn't really an issue.
--
Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
size_t in a struct Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 18:22 +0000
Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 14:52 -0400
Re: size_t in a struct Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 21:31 +0000
Re: size_t in a struct Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-21 09:51 +1200
Re: size_t in a struct Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-05-24 21:34 +0300
Re: size_t in a struct Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-25 07:54 +1200
Re: size_t in a struct "[the China Blue] Drill Baby Drill" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-20 15:06 -0700
Re: size_t in a struct Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-20 22:51 +0000
Re: size_t in a struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-20 15:39 -0700
Re: size_t in a struct Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2011-05-21 18:00 +0000
Re: size_t in a struct Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-05-21 14:12 -0600
Re: size_t in a struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-21 16:31 -0700
Re: size_t in a struct Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-05-22 10:08 +0100
Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-22 13:24 -0500
Re: size_t in a struct Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-05-22 10:37 -0700
Re: size_t in a struct Uncle Steve <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2011-05-22 14:18 -0400
Re: size_t in a struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-22 12:17 -0700
Re: size_t in a struct David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2011-06-01 16:33 -0400
Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 02:05 -0500
Re: size_t in a struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-23 11:21 +0100
Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 19:40 -0500
Re: size_t in a struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-24 01:25 +0100
Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 20:43 -0500
Re: size_t in a struct gordonb.d6jvy@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-05-22 17:48 -0500
Re: size_t in a struct Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-05-21 15:43 +0000
Re: size_t in a struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-20 11:59 -0700
Re: size_t in a struct Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-20 22:24 +0100
csiph-web