Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #4449

size_t in a struct

Show all headers | View raw

Hello Group

To avoid padding in structures, where is the best place to put size_t
variables?

According the faq question 2.12 (http://c-faq.com/struct/padding.html),
it says:

"If you're worried about wasted space, you can minimize the effects of
padding by ordering the members of a structure based on their base
types, from largest to smallest."

So if I have the following:

typedef struct __buffer_t {

    char *buffer;
    size_t size;

} Buffer_t;

I should have mimized padding since size_t is an unsigned long.
However, will size_t ever become an unsigned long long?  If it does,
then size_t still wouldn't be larger than a pointer on the system,
right?  But where should I put size_t in relation to other integer
declarations?  Should I all ways assume size_t is an unsigned long when
building structures?

Now, if I made another structure:

typedef struct __buffer2_t {

     Buffer_t name;
     char *buffer;
     size_t size;

} Buffer2_t;

Is the above still the correct sequence to minimize padding?

Thanks.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

size_t in a struct Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 18:22 +0000
  Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 14:52 -0400
    Re: size_t in a struct Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 21:31 +0000
      Re: size_t in a struct Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-21 09:51 +1200
        Re: size_t in a struct Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-05-24 21:34 +0300
          Re: size_t in a struct Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-25 07:54 +1200
      Re: size_t in a struct "[the China Blue] Drill Baby Drill" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-20 15:06 -0700
        Re: size_t in a struct Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-20 22:51 +0000
      Re: size_t in a struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-20 15:39 -0700
        Re: size_t in a struct Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2011-05-21 18:00 +0000
          Re: size_t in a struct Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-05-21 14:12 -0600
          Re: size_t in a struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-21 16:31 -0700
            Re: size_t in a struct Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-05-22 10:08 +0100
              Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-22 13:24 -0500
                Re: size_t in a struct Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-05-22 10:37 -0700
                Re: size_t in a struct Uncle Steve <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2011-05-22 14:18 -0400
                Re: size_t in a struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-22 12:17 -0700
                Re: size_t in a struct David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2011-06-01 16:33 -0400
                Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 02:05 -0500
                Re: size_t in a struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-23 11:21 +0100
                Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 19:40 -0500
                Re: size_t in a struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-24 01:25 +0100
                Re: size_t in a struct Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 20:43 -0500
          Re: size_t in a struct gordonb.d6jvy@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-05-22 17:48 -0500
      Re: size_t in a struct Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-05-21 15:43 +0000
  Re: size_t in a struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-20 11:59 -0700
  Re: size_t in a struct Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-20 22:24 +0100

csiph-web